Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers meeting with Landon Collins


jdpanther5

Recommended Posts

We've been saying it but no one wants to hear it. Did the Panthers ever meet with Sample?

I don't think we usually meet with prospects who go in the 3rd or later unless there are some health questions or they are from a small school

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have met with loads of mid and late round prospects from both large and small football programs. Check out the prospect meetings list in the Draft forum.

 

Pro days and all star games sure, but it is not that common for us to host them on a visit or do a private workout with them from my recollection

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I don't get all this liability in coverage talk.  That is media propaganda garbage.  Firstly, Bama played a 3-3-5 defense.  So they lined up Collins in man-to-man situations.  Dude's not a corner, so yeah he got beat at times.  Here, he will be playing in zone coverages, allowing him to use that speed of his to make plays.

 

Even if you bought the coverage garbage, we all know Collins will be a step up from Harper.  Though I said before, I like Tillman to play safety for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
    • In 6 games, we've only had 6 hurries??? ... that can't be accurate
×
×
  • Create New...