Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam vs Jake?

X-Clown on 1

By X-Clown on 1,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

The come from behind drives in 2013 against the Pats on MNF and the Saints to win the NFCS don't qualify?

​Close, but that game was won aon a final play by the defense.

I'd actually say he came closer when he came in and played just two weeks after his car accident. Had he actually played that week, it might have been even closer, but I think the coaches made the right decision.

There's gotta be an additional element like that.  Just winning a big game isn't enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

​Yes he was not a starter, but do you not think the experiences he had in those years before the Panthers had an impact on him as a player?

My point merely was, that is 6 years in the NFL, being in a locker room, developing rapport, learning your place, and watching first hand other starting QB's lead teams.

You cannot understate the impact that had for Jake.

Who knows how things would have played out if we threw Jake into the fire in his very first NFL season as a rookie.

But the simple fact is, Delhomme had 5 full seasons worth of that before taking the reigns here. Newton had to learn on the fly from the jump.

​I kinda wish he hadn't, but all that's water under the bridge.

And honestly, I think it has more to do with personality than experience.

For all his bravado, 'entertainer and icon" comments and what have you, Newton's never come across to me as a guy who likes being at the center of the spotlight.  If he were in the military, I think he'd be more comfortable as a soldier than a sergeant.

If you remember "Aliens", personality wise, Delhomme is Apone.  Newton is Hicks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRed Newbie

TheRed

Posted
Posted

​I kinda wish he hadn't, but all that's water under the bridge.

And honestly, I think it has more to do with personality than experience.

For all his bravado, 'entertainer and icon" comments and what have you, Newton's never come across to me as a guy who likes being at the center of the spotlight.  If he were in the military, I think he'd be more comfortable as a soldier than a sergeant.

If you remember "Aliens", personality wise, Delhomme is Apone.  Newton is Hicks.

​They obviously have fairly different personalities. Newton doesn't need to be Delhomme in that regard to be successful here.

Hard to really say the depth of leadership regarding Newton without us being there in the locker room, and seeing him interact with guys first hand.

Greg Olsen has been with Newton since he was a rookie though, and he has touched on this subject multiple times, and each time he went out of his way to praise Cam as a leader. Now sure some people will make the "well what else would he say about his teammate, derp" argument, but Greg Olsen is not a bullshitter, he is a pretty genuine type of guy who speaks his mind. He's made it pretty clear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

​They obviously have fairly different personalities. Newton doesn't need to be Delhomme in that regard to be successful here.

Hard to really say the depth of leadership regarding Newton without us being there in the locker room, and seeing him interact with guys first hand.

Greg Olsen has been with Newton since he was a rookie though, and he has touched on this subject multiple times, and each time he went out of his way to praise Cam as a leader. Now sure some people will make the "well what else would he say about his teammate, derp" argument, but Greg Olsen is not a bullshitter, he is a pretty genuine type of guy who speaks his mind. He's made it pretty clear.

​No, he doesn't need to have the same personality.  Heck, in the movie, Hicks stepped up when he didn't really want to because he had to.  Newton's in a similar position now with guys like Steve Smith gone.

To give you a little perspective, you know who else isn't a natural leader? 

Tom Brady. 

Brady's a surly cuss and a colossal a--hole, but he's a leader now because he's been there for the team's most glorious moments and most of the rest of the roster hasn't been there as long as he has.

Like I said, I do believe Newton will get to that point.  Maybe it'll be a "glory moment" like it was for Brady.  Maybe it'll be a "drama moment" like it was for Delhomme.  Or maybe it'll just be with time.  Maybe it'll happen gradually as the team is built with guys drafted after him.  Hard to say.

But I do believe it'll happen, one way or the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

Holy crap, just read the thread... people actually think Jake was a better QB than Cam? 

 

And i thought the saints report was going to be the dumbest thing I read all day.

​If you think "athlete" equals "quarterback", sure.

Go back and look at guys like Dan Marino and Joe Montana.  Lousy athletes, but great quarterbacks.

As far as things like leadership go, Newton's not there...yet.  But is he still a franchise quarterback, absolutely.  And I have no issue whatsoever with him being at the center of the team.

There's just a "next step" he needs to take, and we're still waiting for that to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cyberjag Newbie

Cyberjag

Posted
Posted

Before 2007 a lot of people thought Jake was the best QB in the South.  I think his years from 2003-2005 were among the best for QB play on the Panthers in team history.  So if I had to win one game, I would want Jake from that time.  But if I was choosing a QB to build and grow around, there's no doubt that Cam has the higher ceiling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Aussie Tank
      I wake up this morning full of rage towards Ronald McDonald Rivera / Gettleman / Hurney

      By Aussie Tank · Posted

      I woke up this morning with a sore back and shoulder's 
    • tukafan21
      Tetairoa McMillan - Your 2025 NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year - (Welp... Guess I Was Right)

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • tukafan21
      Tetairoa McMillan - Your 2025 NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year - (Welp... Guess I Was Right)

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...