NFL top 25 under 25yrs old

[CelibatePimp]

1. Luck 

2. Le'Veon Bell 

3. Odell-Beckham 

4. Luke Kuechly

23. Kelvin Benjamin

24. Star Lotulelei

 

http://www.foxsports.com/south/photos/a-look-at-the-nfl-s-top-25-players-at-age-25-or-younger-052115#img_0

I dunno about Beckham, he is good don't get me wrong but I would put someone like Luke who has been in the league more and performed at a higher level above him. Besides he's also the most decorated on the list with DROY and DPOY.

[t96]

Luke should be #1. He has all time GOAT defender potential and he's already on pace for a hall of fame career. Of course Luck is #1 to these people, but to put Bell and Beckham above Luke is ridiculous. Especially considering OBJ has only played in 12 games and Bell was trash his rookie year.

[Kevin Greene]

Sweet!

[JawnyBlaze]

Bell is a joke at #2, Beckham is the flavor of the week, so I'm not surprised.  They're projecting a bit there, but I wouldn't have a problem with him in the top 5.  Kuechly should definitely be 1 or 2 though.  He is without a doubt better at his position than Luck is at his, but if they're weighing positional importance I can see Luck ahead of him.

[Sean Payton's Vicodin]

and of course people are going to shitpost about luck being number 1 and whining about "no respect" while not realizing that the panthers have the most players on the list

[Jakob]

I'm fine with this list except for OBJ. He's obviously a great talent at WR, but I can't justify placing him in the top 10. His sample size is too small. Didn't even play a full season.

[t96]

and of course people are going to shitpost about luck being number 1 and whining about "no respect" while not realizing that the panthers have the most players on the list

​Not really about respect, they just need to be realistic. You can't logically put Bell or Beckham above Luke. Luck you can make a case for, though I wouldn't agree, but Bell and Beckham are not better than Luke.

[Udogg]

Bell is a joke at #2, Beckham is the flavor of the week, so I'm not surprised.  They're projecting a bit there, but I wouldn't have a problem with him in the top 5.  Kuechly should definitely be 1 or 2 though.  He is without a doubt better at his position than Luck is at his, but if they're weighing positional importance I can see Luck ahead of him.

​

I'm fine with this list except for OBJ. He's obviously a great talent at WR, but I can't justify placing him in the top 10. His sample size is too small. Didn't even play a full season.

​He played 12 games and had 1300 yards.  He had arguably the greatest catch in a game all time.  He did it while basically being the only WR threat on the field.  I love me some Kelvin Benjamin.  However I would swap him in a nano second for OBJ.   He had the second best year ever for a rookie with 12 games!!!! 

Flavor of the week?  Can't justify placing him top 10?  Arguing Luke should be higher is one thing.  Discounting him on the list?  Pfft..

 

[Jakob]

​

​He played 12 games and had 1300 yards.  He had arguably the greatest catch in a game all time.  He did it while basically being the only WR threat on the field.  I love me some Kelvin Benjamin.  However I would swap him in a nano second for OBJ.   He had the second best year ever for a rookie with 12 games!!!! 

Flavor of the week?  Can't justify placing him top 10?  Arguing Luke should be higher is one thing.  Discounting him on the list?  Pfft..

You think I'm underrating OBJ, which I am not. TBH, if he never made that catch he wouldn't be half as popular.

​I'm not saying OBJ isn't an elite talent, because he is. I just take into consideration that he had almost 30 more catches in 5 less games than Kelvin Benjamin. He was force fed the ball which boosted his stats. Kelvin would've averaged the same stats if he was targeted as much as OBJ.

[Verge]

Luck can be argued top 10 at his position

ODB can be argued top 15 at his position

Bell can be argued top 5 at his position

There is not argument that Kuechly is the best ILB in the league.

 

Get your poo straight and stop sucking Lucks knob.

[RelaxImaPro]

There's no reason Beckham and Bell should be ahead of Luke.  Right after him?  Sure.  Luke should, at the lowest, be #2.

[GRWatcher]

Luck & Beckham & Bell probably pull in more viewers than Kuechly. That's the only reason I can think of for Luke to be #4. Not as popular as those 3. Don't care. He's #1 on my list. Tied with 52 other Panther players. :D

[Thorrez]

Luck can be argued top 10 at his position

ODB can be argued top 15 at his position

Bell can be argued top 5 at his position

There is not argument that Kuechly is the best ILB in the league.

 

Get your poo straight and stop sucking Lucks knob.

A top ten qb, which luck is, can carry you to the sb on a hot steak. 

Even a top 2 receiver can do it, just look at Smith during our run. 

A middle linebacker, even as good as Luke,  cannot. 

Anything else is homerism. 

[Verge]

A top ten qb, which luck is, can carry you to the sb on a hot steak. 

Even a top 2 receiver can do it, just look at Smith during our run. 

A middle linebacker, even as good as Luke,  cannot. 

Anything else is homerism. 

​It wasn't "Top 25 under 25 who can carry you to the sb on a hot streak" though. It was top 25 players under 25, and Luke is a better football player than Andrew Luck, Leveon Bell, and ODB.