Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Shaq Thompson's interview cut off by Panther PR


PhillyB

Recommended Posts

Evidently Shaq Thompson focused on ethnic identity and issues at Washington, and one of his senior-year essays was on police brutality. David Newton reports that after the final OTA session yesterday, a reporter asked him follow-up questions about police brutality issues in society today, and the Panthers PR guys jumped in and cut off the interview.

It's only a small blurb on ESPN:

 

More Shaq: One of Thompson’s final essays at Washington was on police brutality. His post-practice interview was cut off by Carolina public relations during follow-up questions.

 

It seems pretty obvious that a high-profile organization would be hesitant to allow a new employee to speak on their behalf about an explosive social issue, especially with the way social media makes these things instantaneously known, so I can't blame them for enforcing an overarching policy that probably exists for any sensitive questions not directly related to football topics.

That said, it's disappointing that in any forum, not addressing the problem at all is preferable to possibly causing a kerfuffle by addressing it. This is the beguiling power of institutions, after all; they are sources of power that maintain the status quo. Their power is cultural as well as legal, and as a controlling mechanism, it's perpetuated when other organizations or individuals refuse to address what exactly it is they're controlling. Fear of backlash is just another tool in the pocket of institutions that don't want to change.

 

On a more directly football-related note, Shaq was roundly named in the top 3 safeties in the nation by draft organizations (as well as by his performances in college) and I can't help but hope we give him snaps at strong safety in camp. We're fairly deep at OLB and there's nothing more I'd love to see than our number one pick be able to come in and replace Roman Harper's production at the position. We'd be set for a decade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That said, it's disappointing that in any forum, not addressing the problem at all is preferable to possibly causing a kerfuffle by addressing it.  

​It's not a football team's job to be addressing it at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every interview is cut off at some point. Every day follow up questions are stopped short. Not sure the subject matter had anything to do with it. Sounds speculative.

​Considering the deep issues surrounding the Rams players and either side of the Ferguson issue, I'm sure every PR employee in the league is briefed and briefed again on watching where interviews lead.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

invocation and all of the jingoistic salute our troops poo is very political and athletes mixing sport with politics has led to some extremely powerful moments in american history. hopefully thompson gets an opportunity to say whatever it is that he has to say while off the clock at the very least

​yep. if shaq thompson was asked about supporting the troops, he'd have not been cut off and no one would've considered it political. again, institutions regulate and maintain the status quo. it's not that they don't want politics involved in sport, they don't want inconvenient politics involved in sport. nature of the beast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He can’t even learn to run routes. No chance in hell he can do both that and pick up blocking schemes 
    • Well he had essentially a 70% completion rate for almost three thousand yards.  Biggest issues were awkward and inconsistent release.  I wouldn't call arm strength bad, but not great.    
    • I see him being better and most of that is a few downfield passes that were seemingly non existent.    But it is what is around him that has dictated the trajectory more than the quarterbacking. He is game manager level and unable to dictate to defenses.  And even if I am wrong and he is the reason we ‘upwarded’, we are bumping our heads on the ceiling and only making meager gains. If it is an incline it is awfully shallow degree wise. Like a finance graph that tracks your progress and hovers around the rate of inflation. Barely breaking even.  Is that where you want your money?  We make up these deadlines expectations and generally he does the minimum of what he needs to do to hang around.    It does not encourage me to believe that when we get into a game against a good run d that we cannot break down with our run game, to believe that we can pivot to the air and successfully counter their strategy.  But they run it back again. Of course I am gunshy of a repeat of the same thing we have watched for three years.    oh, and yes his durability is his most impressive positive for my money. I fear the other shoe dropping on that and the contractual consequences that will follow.   Last  of all, too late to edit my mistake here but would like to acknowledge it: the last three years has done very little to convince me that I was not wrong in not wanting him. One too many “not”s. 
×
×
  • Create New...