Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Frank Kaminsky Selection Poll

Jeremy Igo

By Jeremy Igo,
in Charlotte Hornets

Recommended Posts

RoaringRiot Collaborator

RoaringRiot

Posted
Posted

I only hate the pick because passing on Winslow seems like a huge mistake. I'm not even mad at Frank. He doesn't excite me, but I do think he fits Cliff's system and was a need. Winslow is exciting and will put butts in the seats. Tough to pass on that. Only thing that will make it better is winning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted

I think he will be better than you guys think.  A smart passer, a solid outside shooter with good footwork inside.  Not who I would have picked, but not a disaster either.

He should be able to play right now, something that counts.  I just think we have a terrible front office.  Period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cbarrier90 Newbie

cbarrier90

Posted
Posted

I think he will be better than you guys think.  A smart passer, a solid outside shooter with good footwork inside.  Not who I would have picked, but not a disaster either.

He should be able to play right now, something that counts.  I just think we have a terrible front office.  Period.

Winslow would have come off the bench and anchored the 2nd unit defense. Also would have allowed us to have a future without having to overpay Batum. The idea of this is just making me more angry as I type it out.

Still in shock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
Posted

I think he will be better than you guys think.  A smart passer, a solid outside shooter with good footwork inside.  Not who I would have picked, but not a disaster either.

He should be able to play right now, something that counts.  I just think we have a terrible front office.  Period.

With Clifford setting the rotation with Zeller, Frank, Al, and Hawes...this could very well turn into a disaster. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Manos Newbie

Manos

Posted
Posted

With Clifford setting the rotation with Zeller, Frank, Al, and Hawes...this could very well turn into a disaster. 

Don't forget that Biz could very well be back. Even with all the bigs we have he should be cheap to keep so that is yet another man into the rotation. And sadly none of them fit very well with each other. I really hope we find a way to move Frank and Al for anything at this point otherwise I see this season being another disaster.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
Posted

Don't forget that Biz could very well be back. Even with all the bigs we have he should be cheap to keep so that is yet another man into the rotation. And sadly none of them fit very well with each other. I really hope we find a way to move Frank and Al for anything at this point otherwise I see this season being another disaster.

For some reason (and considering who we have, I don't know why) but I just don't think we're gonna retain Biz. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • Dave Gettleman's Shorts
      TIME TO SPECULATE

      By Dave Gettleman's Shorts · Posted

      adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...