Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hornets Forum Revival...

Jeremy Igo

By Jeremy Igo,
in Charlotte Hornets

Recommended Posts

Jeremy Igo Newbie

Jeremy Igo

Posted
Posted

Hello all. 

 

This section of the Huddle is first and foremost a Hornets forum. It has come to my attention that some folks seem to enjoy just popping in here to poo on the Hornets without adding much (if any) value to this joint. 

As such, those people will find themselves banned not only from the Hornets section but the rest of the Huddle as well. If you don't have something constructive to say about the Hornets (positive or negative) and find yourself in here just to troll.... you may want to stop. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jakob Newbie

Jakob

Posted
Posted

Hello all. 

 

This section of the Huddle is first and foremost a Hornets forum. It has come to my attention that some folks seem to enjoy just popping in here to poo on the Hornets without adding much (if any) value to this joint. 

As such, those people will find themselves banned not only from the Hornets section but the rest of the Huddle as well. If you don't have something constructive to say about the Hornets (positive or negative) and find yourself in here just to troll.... you may want to stop. 

 

Impossible to converse with someone who calls themselves a "fan" yet they poo on the team 24/7. My posting in this section went down from 2-3 a day to once a week because of it. I'll definitely return to form if I don't have to listen to the debbie downers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nctarheel0619 Newbie

nctarheel0619

Posted
Posted

I don't mind negative posts as long as they are well thought out and provide some worth to this forum. 

 

"this teams sucks" is not a good post. 

 

"This team needs big improvement in these areas" is a much better post. 

Sadly most will just destroy the pick that we had and not say what we should've done better.  But it's kind of common sense at this point, I suppose.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CCU Norman Newbie

CCU Norman

Posted
Posted

On vacation will get back Sunday. I'll do a breakdown of a player on our team. Their strength and weakness. Projected minutes. And other stuff. Just inbox me the player a player if you want a specific one if not it will just be a random order

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By strato · Posted

      Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • outlaw4
      Dan had a great draft

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • 45catfan
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By 45catfan · Posted

      I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...