Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Preseason Run Defense: Some Perspective


mr beauxjangles

Recommended Posts

Last year the Panthers were 20th against the run, allowing 4.43 yards per attempt (1912 yards on 432 attempts).

During the preseason, our opponents ran 118 times for 535 yards for an average of 4.53 yards per attempt.

Last year, opponents ran 27 times per game on the Panthers. If we take the difference between the preseason yards/attempt allowed by the Panthers, and last season's yards/attempt allowed, we get 0.1 yard/attempt. At ana verage of 27 attempts per game, this translates into 2.7 additional rushing yards allowed per game by the Panthers run defense.

It is also worth noting that the four teams we played in the preseason were ranked 1st, 4th, 11th, and 23rd in rushing offense last year. That averages to 9.75 - top one third of the league. This is far better than the average of the teams we faced against all of last year (average 16.0625 rank for rushing offense).

Now of course, this is preseason, so it's all really irrelevant. And of course, this isn't limited to starting defense versus starting backfields. So just take it for what's it worth - not much other than a little perspective. I just thought it was interesting to illustrate that the run defense hasn't really taken much of a hit despite the issues of quality and quantity at the DT position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know why everyone is so worried about the run defense.....it is the pass defense that we were horrible at last year......and there is no reason to believe the Panthers will be any better this year. At least if teams run on us it makes the odds for a close game better.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few years ago (I think right when we picked up Kemo and still had Jenkins) nobody but nobody could run on us in the preseason.

When we got to the regular season, people were running all over us.

It's times like that I'm reminded that preseason is never as informative as people think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a few years ago (i think right when we picked up kemo and still had jenkins) nobody but nobody could run on us in the preseason.

When we got to the regular season, people were running all over us.

It's times like that i'm reminded that preseason is never as informative as people think.

qft

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year the Panthers were 20th against the run, allowing 4.43 yards per attempt (1912 yards on 432 attempts).

During the preseason, our opponents ran 118 times for 535 yards for an average of 4.53 yards per attempt.

Last year, opponents ran 27 times per game on the Panthers. If we take the difference between the preseason yards/attempt allowed by the Panthers, and last season's yards/attempt allowed, we get 0.1 yard/attempt. At ana verage of 27 attempts per game, this translates into 2.7 additional rushing yards allowed per game by the Panthers run defense.

It is also worth noting that the four teams we played in the preseason were ranked 1st, 4th, 11th, and 23rd in rushing offense last year. That averages to 9.75 - top one third of the league. This is far better than the average of the teams we faced against all of last year (average 16.0625 rank for rushing offense).

Now of course, this is preseason, so it's all really irrelevant. And of course, this isn't limited to starting defense versus starting backfields. So just take it for what's it worth - not much other than a little perspective. I just thought it was interesting to illustrate that the run defense hasn't really taken much of a hit despite the issues of quality and quantity at the DT position.

the only part of the whole paragraph that mattered

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
    • Football is not the professional sport where timidness and apprehension are justly rewarded. 
    • Bryce Young had a super high floor definitely at least won't be a bust safe pick we allegedly had seen in some time.......and went on to have one of the worst rookie seasons of all time.  They are all lotto picks.  And that is especially true for whatever they will be day 1 in the NFL.  I don't think Tmac is a sure thing year 1.  It's not like we watched him do his thing in the SEC.  He was a PAC12 guy.  I'm sure it will take time
×
×
  • Create New...