Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Which is the bigger glaring Problem?


Ivan The Awesome

Which is the bigger problem?  

93 members have voted

  1. 1. So which is it?

    • Shula's vanilla offensive play calling?
      64
    • The Wide Receiver 'Problem'?
      29


Recommended Posts

Hey guys. Just a little perspective. I'd like for you all to think about this for a moment. 

 

Which will be a bigger problem? Shula or the 'wide receiver' problem?

 

I put air quotes on the latter problem because after some thought. It might not be as big as the previous one. 

Let me explain for a moment. 

We technically still have our #1 receiver in Greg Olsen. He's healthy and has never missed a game. He has a connection with Cam that has grown stronger though out the years. Yes the loss of Kelvin is huge but we are still in it. The season has not started. David Gettleman has done it again and brought in a familiar face in Ted Ginn Jr that has worked out well for this team. If you haven't seen it, he too has chemistry with Cam, it's been evident in practice, the joint practice with the Dolphins and also in preseason. This will only get better with time. That takes us to the enigma that is Devin Funchess. On paper you like what you see, there is no denying this. His current injuries are a problem but generally speaking, he's in good health. I call him an Enigma because we don't know what we will get with him at the current moment. Kelvin Benjamin may have spoiled the fan base last year and to be quite honest the expectations should be tempered. Regardless, Funchess has the opportunity to shine and at least produce decent numbers as a rookie. His learning curve may be slower than KB's but with Proehl coaching him up, I do not believe he won't get it. Then you have your role players. The player/Coach in Cotchery. The sure handed Bersin that has good chemistry with Cam. Brown, who even though is struggling right now, has shown what he can do. Norwood is the only person that would really be a non factor, although he could turn out to be one of the better prospect. I take Gettleman is no ones fool and he would not trade for someone that would be a project. 

 

Now lets take a look at the other problem that's been here for several years now, one that in my personal opinion is bigger.

 

Mike Shula. We all know who he is. We all know what he's done. I believe it is a safe bet that he doesn't really have any supporters in the huddle. Yet, that does not really matter. What matters is that we all know he is incompetent to put it bluntly. Our very own MFCEO warned us long ago before his 'promotion' that he was as vanilla as they come. It is true. He runs a very bland offense, there is no innovation in a fiber of his very being and that my fellow huddlers is a huge problem. Yes, the Kelvin Benjamin injury is huge, it is a huge problem. But the bigger issue in my eyes would have to be our unimaginative offensive coordinator. The brass could be happy with his current track record. I mean under him we've been to the playoffs, but really, was that Shula, or the team itself? Having a stingy defense, a Franchise QB, a pro bowl tight end, a break out rookie wide out and all you could muster is below average offense? Just to sneak into the playoffs? That to me is the definition of incompetence and just 'getting by'. No I'm not diminishing the feat of coming back from a lost season. I'm just putting it out there that it wasn't really because of Shula. The brass may turn a blind eye to this problem, but it's a recurring one. He's even admitted that Cam does not agree with a lot of his play calling. Which you can take with a grain of salt since a lot of QB's will tend to disagree on something with their OC's. The fact is, Cam Newton is a play maker, a unique talent that needs to be used as such. I remember the day where huddlers would make jokes about Chud, but hey the man had vision, he had also the cojones to try something out of the ordinary. I can't remember any other year that the offense wasn't as exciting to watch. I realize this team is a running team, even running plays can be a little innovative. The players themselves are being held accountable and have been held accountable. For how long? When will the plays being called be questioned? Rivera has matured from his decision making, McDermott as well. But when will Shula?

 

Honestly, we're looking at the wrong problem. To me this problem has a higher priority than not having Kelvin. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Technically we still have our #1 wide receiver in Greg Olsen"... Technically, he is tight end....

Shula has been OC for two years. Last year, what could he have really done? What options was he really left with, with a LT that couldn't block and a wide receiver core composed of, outside of Benjamin, an unrefined UDFA, and slotman Cotchery running around the perimeter for half the season. I would say that severely limits your playcalling. Too many people on this board refuse to look at the failure of execution and just yell "Bad playcalling." 

I'm not saying Shula is good, but I'm saying this isn't the only fan base to hate their offensive coordinator. Half of you don't even know what McDermott is really calling other than zone or man. You just look and go, "Wow, they are good.... McDermott is good!"

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Technically we still have our #1 wide receiver in Greg Olsen"... Technically, he is tight end....

Shula has been OC for two years. Last year, what could he have really done? What options was he really left with, with a LT that couldn't block and a wide receiver core composed of, outside of Benjamin, an unrefined UDFA, and slotman Cotchery running around the perimeter for half the season. I would say that severely limits your playcalling. Too many people on this board refuse to look at the failure of execution and just yell "Bad playcalling." 

I'm not saying Shula is good, but I'm saying this isn't the only fan base to hate their offensive coordinator. Half of you don't even know what McDermott is really calling other than zone or man. You just look and go, "Wow, they are good.... McDermott is good!"

 

That called coaching as well. If you've seen how McDermott coaches to Shula, you can tell the Defense would ride to the gates of hell with him. You can't say the same about old Shula. At what point will you start blaming the brass? So players will be the scapegoat all the time? You have talent on the roster. Gettleman has taken care of that in 2 years. The Offensive line finally looks to be in at least decent shape. Cam is healthy, you have your #1 in Olsen and an Okay supporting cast. The problem is with the wide out issue, Shula won't make any changes, he won't really plan around it. 

 

How do you manage to lose an elite defensive end and still be a top 10 defense? I'm sure McDermott planned around Hardy's departure, with what Gettleman supplied. Why can't shula?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam can audible a bad play. Cam can't make Corey Brown catch. 

Maybe Cam shouldn't be looking his way and go through his progressions. Maybe Brown should be utilized in a different manner that gives him the ball, a reverse perhaps? I mean there are ways to get the ball to people. Why are we anchored on Brown when there is Cotchery, Ginn, Dickson, Olsen, Funchess, etc....Make do with what you have. Brown isn't going to drop all his passes either. I can't condemn him for the past two preseason games. I can only hope he gets his act together because he has in the past. So yeah. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That called coaching as well. If you've seen how McDermott coaches to Shula, you can tell the Defense would ride to the gates of hell with him. You can't say the same about old Shula. At what point will you start blaming the brass? So players will be the scapegoat all the time? You have talent on the roster. Gettleman has taken care of that in 2 years. The Offensive line finally looks to be in at least decent shape. Cam is healthy, you have your #1 in Olsen and an Okay supporting cast. The problem is with the wide out issue, Shula won't make any changes, he won't really plan around it. 

 

How do you manage to lose an elite defensive end and still be a top 10 defense? I'm sure McDermott planned around Hardy's departure, with what Gettleman supplied. Why can't shula?

Our defense is loaded with actual talent....without Hardy you can still argue from a talent perspective we had one of the top 5 best front 7s in the entire NFL last season. 

Offense?  You could argue talent around our QB was easily bottom half of the league (being conservative)

McD and Shula aren't supplied comparable talent.  Shula deserves to be knocked but I think it goes overboard with how it is approached 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seahawks had both problems the last 2 years and won 2 nfc championship games and a Super Bowl...

Seahawks can line up in boring vanilla traditional runs and run in down your throat....

they also have the best D in the NFL.  They had the #1 and play as vanilla as you can on D...our D wasn't really one of the 10 best

Hawks roster is more talented than us.  There coaching on both sides is vanilla 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...