Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What Texans Fans Are Saying

Jeremy Igo

By Jeremy Igo,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

But not the PANTHERS defense.  And there's a reason he's not the starter.  Or is he?

he still played well against solid defenses last year and had his team in both.

and we don't know what we are this year....and our D wasn't elite last year either 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
the butch Newbie

the butch

Posted
Posted

he still played well against solid defenses last year and had his team in both.

and we don't know what we are this year....and our D wasn't elite last year either 

You're arguing with yourself there, man.  You made the Browns and Bengals comment.  I'm talking about this year.  If Mallet is good at keeping his teams in games, well that's right in line with my thinking of this game:  it will be close, but Cam gets the edge over the Houston D before Mallet over ours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
htown704 Newbie

htown704

Posted
Posted

More nonsense from the Texans message board:

"I think he's (Ryan Mallett) going to make a name for himself in this game.
25-for-30 passing: 370 passing yards with 5 TDs and 0 INTs.
He'll be sacked zero times because of his extremely fast release.

He'll be seen raising his arm and emotionally sparking this team.
The Texans win 38-13 and everything is good around here next week."

I found this on another major Texans board you can visit HERE.  This one is definitely my favorite.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
the butch Newbie

the butch

Posted
Posted (edited)

I found this on another major Texans board you can visit HERE.  This one is definitely my favorite.

The VERY FACT that he had to put Mallet in parenthesis completely undermines his whole point.  Like, dude, you're putting his name in parenthesis because your pronoun is inconclusive, i.e., we don't know who "he" is because you don't know who you starting QB is.  What a joke.

Edited by Dick the Butcher
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
htown704 Newbie

htown704

Posted
Posted

The VERY FACT that he had to put Mallet in parenthesis completely undermines his whole point.  Like, dude, you're putting his name in parenthesis because your pronoun is inconclusive, i.e., we don't know who "he" is because you don't know who you starting QB is.  What a joke.

Sorry dude, that was me that put the Parenthesis in there so people knew who he was referencing. I should have made that more clear!  My bad!

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Panthers' content round up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...