Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Monday Night Countdown: Andrew Luck needs more around him.


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

Its close... KB is a top 5 WR talent. Olsen is a top 2 or 3 TE and Stewart is positiontop 5 RB.

 

Our offensive line is also better.

no it isn't close..  we lose either guy what do we have?? They lose 1 at each position and have back ups.. So just stop..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One is 1-1 who beat another 1-1 team. Close enough...

 

to be fair Cam doesn't get the benefit of facing the Jags, Titans, and Texans twice a year... All teams who have picked in the top 10 multiple times ...

Guys...

It's pretty hard for a team to lose to us and still be 2-0. Methinks you missed his joke. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luck is the most overrated QB I have ever witnessed. He continually makes bad decisions, throws into double (sometimes even triple) coverage, and is just clumsy with the football yet people never want to talk about that. The dude is NO WHERE near the elite QB's and it's disrespectful to Brady, Rodgers, and Manning to even mention Luck with them. No matter what the media feeds, Cam is right there (if not better) than the likes of WIlson and Luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luck is the most overrated QB I have ever witnessed. He continually makes bad decisions, throws into double (sometimes even triple) coverage, and is just clumsy with the football yet people never want to talk about that. The dude is NO WHERE near the elite QB's and it's disrespectful to Brady, Rodgers, and Manning to even mention Luck with them. No matter what the media feeds, Cam is right there (if not better) than the likes of WIlson and Luck.

Bolded portion I agree wholeheartedly.  Seriously, no other QBs are at the same level as Brady, Rodgers, Manning and Brees right now, with CLOSE consideration for Big Ben and Phil Rivers.

These are all guys who are close to having 10 + years in the league.  Look Cam, Wilson and Luck are the next generation of NFL quarterbacks, but playing at that level just doesn't happen overnight.  It takes a heck of a lot of time and experience.  I think all three of the young quarterbacks certainly can and will be as good as the future HOFers, but it takes time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luck is Matthew Stafford reincarnated.  Throw the ball a lot, compile a lot of stats but never get anywhere.  And that gets boring and the coach gets fired. Luck is incapable of maintaining a 60% completion.  Not a natural passer. You can't be elite if you're not naturally accurate.  Good but not elite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I said could, not would. I recognize he has potential based on past performance. Compared to what KP has done, Howell has more potential and the physical traits to make noise. KP has small hands and a weak arm. Not something you want in even your backup QB.  I've been hammering since last off-season before we re-signed Dalton, improve the room. Other than getting younger, I don't see how anyone can say we legitimately improved the room or even tried. We might as well have signed Josh Rosen.  Dalton is still on the roster for now. That's 3 QBs unless we trade or cut him. He's still Bryce's mentor after all. Do you believe we are going to draft someone with potential and give them a legitimate opportunity to develop from the practice squad? Are we going to carry 3 QBs on the active roster? 4 for a developmental rookie? Are we going to potentially cut KP if we draft a rookie and he's outperformed? Doubtful. Cutting Dalton(if we can't trade him) and KP would be 8m in wasted cap space.  I chose Howell as an example because he showed promise in his only full season as a starter. You could plug in another name with the physical traits and potential and what i said would still apply. KP showed almost nothing and was benched. I genuinely don't care if it’s rookie pick as long as there is the potential to develop into a future NFL QB.  As much as I can't stand him, Bellichek was always developing a number 2 QB even with the GOAT as his starter. The wisdom of that was evident when Cassell came in when Brady was hurt week 1 and went 11-5 and almost made the wildcard, which 11-5 gets you almost any other year. I give credit where it's due though. Cassel and Jimmy G both came into the league as developmental QBs, potential QB1s, and went on to have careers.  You never know if you never try. KP feels like a punt in addressing the most important position on the field. Bryce has never played 2 full games of franchise QB level football back to back.  If Bryce progresses, are you ready to offer a 280m 5 year extension based off a one hit wonder year? If Bryce regresses and we need a QB in 27, are we going to trade a fortune away again to trade up to 1 to get one? Are you ready to do the past 3 years all over again?  To me, it's not about Kenny Pickett. It's about the move itself. It was a feeble attempt to improve the QB room. We better hope Bryce succeeds, because if he doesn't, we literally have no backup plan right now.   
    • IOL that early isn’t good value at all. We have a LT who might not ever be good again and a RT that might retire soon. T seems deep early in this draft, so I’d go there in the 1st. 
    • Season tickets aren't affordable anymore definitely when they've been so bad for 8 years before last season. When I started going my seats were front row uppers for like 38 bucks. Those seats are 100 dollars now. Teams make their money from tv, if I was an owner my goal would be to break even on tickets and concessions. 
×
×
  • Create New...