Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Practice Squad: Byrd back, bumps Blechen


jdpanther5

Recommended Posts

Not so sure about Bersin being called up. Why dump Blechen if you were gonna do that?

There are basically 2 types of practice squad player now. The traditional, limited-experience players you can have a max of 8 of, and 2 exceptions with up to two years of experience (Bersin and Glanton).

Simply promoting Bersin and signing Byrd would make it 9 and 1, or an invalid combination. So in order to bring back Byrd they had to let another of the 8 go: Blechen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are basically 2 types of practice squad player now. The traditional, limited-experience players you can have a max of 8 of, and 2 exceptions with up to two years of experience (Bersin and Glanton).

Simply promoting Bersin and signing Byrd would make it 9 and 1, or an invalid combination. So in order to bring back Byrd they had to let another of the 8 go: Blechen. 

Makes sense.

Honestly, I was just thinking in terms of pure numbers, but what you said applies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not so sure about Bersin being called up. Why dump Blechen if you were gonna do that?

Bersin could come up on a Friday (or whatever the last day is that someone from the PS could be active that week) and be fine with a jersey on Sunday, so my guess is that they're evaluating Cotchery to see just how bad the injury is before making a call like that.  Plus, they'd have to drop someone from the active roster. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bersin could come up on a Friday (or whatever the last day is that someone from the PS could be active that week) and be fine with a jersey on Sunday, so my guess is that they're evaluating Cotchery to see just how bad the injury is before making a call like that.  Plus, they'd have to drop someone from the active roster. 

Yep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bersin could come up on a Friday (or whatever the last day is that someone from the PS could be active that week) and be fine with a jersey on Sunday, so my guess is that they're evaluating Cotchery to see just how bad the injury is before making a call like that.  Plus, they'd have to drop someone from the active roster. 

Yup.  I have no problem with Bersin being called up.  He's obviously a plug & play kind of guy with his experience last year and he basically matches Cotchery's kind of play.

Question is who would you let go from the 53?

1) IR someone if there is a serious injury.  At this point I'm not aware that we have an IR candidate unless there's bad news on Star, Luke, Cotch, D Williams or even Brockel and we'd put one of them on the IR with designation to return list.  Obviously we don't want to go there unless required to do so.

2) Otherwise, you're looking at demoting someone to PS and exposing them to waivers.  Options would be Marlowe, Wegher or possibly Mayo.   Can't believe it would be Mayo with Luke not yet being cleared..., so that leaves Marlowe or Wegher.  Wegher's about to be featured on Undrafted this week I think, keeping his talent fresh in people's minds (not that this is a big factor in a GM's decision to claim someone off waivers!), so my guess is that it could be Marlowe if they demote anyone?

Is there any scenario I'm missing? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup.  I have no problem with Bersin being called up.  He's obviously a plug & play kind of guy with his experience last year and he basically matches Cotchery's kind of play.

Question is who would you let go from the 53?

1) IR someone if there is a serious injury.  At this point I'm not aware that we have an IR candidate unless there's bad news on Star, Luke, Cotch, D Williams or even Brockel and we'd put one of them on the IR with designation to return list.  Obviously we don't want to go there unless required to do so.

2) Otherwise, you're looking at demoting someone to PS and exposing them to waivers.  Options would be Marlowe, Wegher or possibly Mayo.   Can't believe it would be Mayo with Luke not yet being cleared..., so that leaves Marlowe or Wegher.  Wegher's about to be featured on Undrafted this week I think, keeping his talent fresh in people's minds (not that this is a big factor in a GM's decision to claim someone off waivers!), so my guess is that it could be Marlowe if they demote anyone?

Is there any scenario I'm missing? 

I think I've already said this, but I think we'll have an extraneous DT if Star is good to go. Cole or Love could be an option. 

Unfortunately you can't just "demote" someone to the practice squad, they'd have to pass through waivers first. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Was at the game and NYCFC honestly outplayed CLT the whole way.  Khalina and Zaha carried the team.  Zaha's wife on IG making it sound like he's gone come July. They're going to have to pay him or find a big time replacement because the team looks like pretty lost without him.
    • No one's saying LaMelo has no blame we're responding to you acting like he's the reason they lost. The scapegoating and blaming the teams woes on his personality is where it's like Cam Newton all over again. It was a failure on multiple fronts and primarily Lee's. Dude said ON AIR pregame that they had to protect the paint and if that was his gameplan going in he couldn't have botched it more. As the commentators said Ball's a rhythm guy and Orlando was preventing him for getting any kind of flow going. I'm a normie watching on TV and said they needed to bait them into fouling to combat that. They didn't even try until the 2nd half when it was too late. I think it's fair to expect the star to overcome whatever but LaMelo was not the problem in that game and he's not what is holding the team back. He's the only reason they're flirting with being a great team. I kinda put the center play on Lee too. Moose is great until he's up against a big who can body him. We've always known that and that's what Kalkbrenner is for. I don't know if it would have changed much but Kalkbrenner should have had more minutes than him.  And moving forward with the center position, I just think it's the time to trade Diabate while his stock's high and that's not an indictment of his game. He's like an evolved combination of Biyombo and PJ. He's a great rim protector and the strength issue is just what you're going to have to deal with if you want that. But Kalkbrenner is perfectly capable of protecting the rim and we gotta get away from the undersized centers or it'll always be a problem for us.
    • Honestly its why that Jalen Coker grab was a big deal.  I'd been warming up to the idea of a sadiq pick and was adamantly against a receiver...but this altered my train of thought.  I mean For instance, Cade Otton signed for 3 yr 30 mil contract...thats not dramatically different than the rookie payscale for #19 (4 year 20 mil with 5th year option), however you KNOW otton is decent...no clue if Sadiq will be anything. 
×
×
  • Create New...