Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The #2 we let get away.


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Some teams run more, and some teams pass more. Some teams must pass more out of necessity. Cam Newton has been our saving grace in the running game so far. But, even still, stop clouding the issue. However little we run or pass is immaterial. Snead would likely be doing more for us, even if only just on a relative basis, than what we are fielding right now.  That's not a difficult concept. It's not a stretch. It's not outlandish. Deal with it!

Hard to say what Snead would be doing for us right now.

He has been with the Saints developing, learning, and finding his fit within their offense since December of last year. That is a huge factor. He was only here with us for 44 days, on the practice squad, and that was well into the season.

Seems like there is really no sense conversing with you if you are just going to continue willfully bypassing factors that don't align with your narrative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if I believe we have one of the best GM's in the NFL, and that his talent evaluation is top notch...

 

...I am a "short sniffer"?

 

I think a few things need to be touched here:

  • The "wide receiver friendly" offense ran in New Orleans matters, and is a valid argument.
  • We have given opportunity to many young players since Gettleman has been here, perhaps mainly for financial reasons, but we still have nonetheless.
  • Let's see how Snead and his team do the remainder of the season before we care too much about this.

You're a good poster Top Dawg, but some of your posts in this thread have been borderline "trollish".

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard to say what Snead would be doing for us right now.

He has been with the Saints developing, learning, and finding his fit within their offense since December of last year. That is a huge factor. He was only here with us for 44 days, on the practice squad, and that was well into the season.

Seems like there is really no sense conversing with you if you are just going to continue willfully bypassing factors that don't align with your narrative.

You're right. No need to continue If you and others are going to cherry pick stats and don't show any discrimination or inclination for extrapolation based upon a relative perspective. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're right. No need to continue If you and others are going to cherry pick stats and don't show any discrimination or inclination for extrapolation based upon a relative perspective. 

 

Yeah, it must be everybody else who just doesn't get it. Couldn't be that maybe top dawg is guilty of the same poo he is ridiculing others for. That just wouldn't make sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Just because" they are successful in another system doesn't necessarily mean they won't be "successful" in your system as well.  

Perhaps it's not about the system so much as it it is about people needing to expand their minds. 

It isn't about people needing to expand their minds, it's about understanding that offensive schemes differ and certain schemes can fit the strengths of some guys.  Ever heard of a "system QB"?  Some elite players would have success in any scheme.  You take a Steve Smith or Dez Bryant or Calvin Johnson, the guy is just a baller.  Put him in any offense and he's going to produce.  Most players aren't like that.  It is hard for an offense to be much different from a WR's perspective than ours vs. the Saints'.  If you can't understand that then I can't help you.  Maybe he could've been successful here, but our coaches and front office got a good look at him and concluded that he wouldn't be.  The Saints' offense gives a WR a lot more space to work than ours does and catching a pinpoint floaty Drew Brees pass is a little different than trying to snag a rocket from Cam.  Just two different worlds, both in terms of scheme and in terms of QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thankfully Marty Hurney landed Cam Newton, Greg Olsen, Ryan Kalil, Luke Kuechly, Thomas Davis, and Josh Norman. They are carrying this team this season and last.

Without them this team would be a dumpster fire with the rest of the squandered talent from the current administration.

Yeah, it's a shame this team isn't having the kind of success it did back in 2010, 11 and 12, when Hurney was in charge.

Heck, all we've done since he was fired is win the division and go to the playoffs, resulting in low draft picks.

What the hell were they thinking letting him go?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're right. No need to continue If you and others are going to cherry pick stats and don't show any discrimination or inclination for extrapolation based upon a relative perspective. 

 

That makes little sense, mostly because you, as the one making the initial claim, are required to back up YOUR assertion with sound stats and data that lead those you are trying to convince to the same conclusion. Not accepting your dataset and proposing alternative datapoints and variables (such as offensive scheme) is perfectly reasonable and does not make one a 'hater', particularly when your conclusion is based on a statistically-insignificant amount of data and a logical, data-driven approach looking at a wider dataset leads to a different conclusion than yours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, it's a shame this team isn't having the kind of success it did back in 2010, 11 and 12, when Hurney was in charge.

Heck, all we've done since he was fired is win the division and go to the playoffs, resulting in low draft picks.

What the hell were they thinking letting him go?

Hurney without a doubt put together the core of this team, but he failed miserably to build a team around that core.  I give him credit for landing us some great players, but it was time for the Panthers to move on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, PhillyB. I knew that there would be some snark in this thread because there always is. There are certain people on the Huddle that just like to razz me and get me all riled up for entertainment value. There are others that just don't get me, and, yes, there are those that just don't like Top Dawg or love to hate Top Dawg.  It just comes with the territory. Sure I have an ego that pokes through, but it is what it is. Roughly five years ago, an old lady that barely knew me called me a know-it-all to my face. I was somewhat miffed immediately, but I quickly became amused as I realized that it wasn't the first time someone hit me out of left field. Some people are just intimidated by natural intelligence and because you have it and it shows. As a result, they want to make it about you when the only thing that you're guilty of is expressing an intelligent opinion about which something they disagree. Even the most benign remark or thought garners their disdain. This is even more true on the Internet where basically strangers can hide behind an LCD and express whatever to prop up their e-rep. Me, you get the same guy all the time. 

This thread right here is about Willie Snead. I hate we let him get away, and I don't want to see anything like it happen in the future (with Byrd, Rakim Cox or anyone). It will probably happen again though. It's just one of those things. I don't really "blame" Gettleman for it, but the buck does stop with him. I am just a little wistful about it is all, especially in this situation. It's basically a ain't-that-bitch moment? 

Are you people seriously just going to gloss over this comment or did everyone just accidentally skip this gem?

 

Guise

Seriously guise

I'm so smart

Guise Listen

I'm so smart an old lady was a BITCH to me about my smartness

 

Top Dawg, I have  website for you

https://www.reddit.com/r/iamverysmart

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Are you people seriously just going to gloss over this comment or did everyone just accidentally skip this gem?

 

 

Top Dawg, I have  website for you

https://www.reddit.com/r/iamverysmart

 

 

One of my favorite occurrences on the internet is when someone is essentially calling other people stupid while making numerous grammatical errors in the process.  top dawg loves to try to make himself look smarter than he is by attempting to use words and grammatical structures that are simply beyond him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hurney without a doubt put together the core of this team, but he failed miserably to build a team around that core.  I give him credit for landing us some great players, but it was time for the Panthers to move on.

Agreed, but the post to which I responded there is pure stupidity.

Plus Hurney had some unforgivable draft whiffs. If you look back at who he passed over for who he took, it's mind blowing 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No. Physical tools alone aren't enough. There are plenty of examples of draft busts to support that. Aost all of them had the physical tools and that wasn't enough. But Bryce is a perfect example of the opposite. Absolutely elite intangibles aren't enough either. If you simply don't have the physical abilities all the football intelligence and work ethic in the world won't be enough to overcome it. Just look to the sidelines every Sunday. We call those people "coaches".
    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
    • If you plug Bryce onto the Pro Bowl roster you might have a chance to compete for a SB. If he's surrounded by top tier talent with a top tier defense on the other side, a field flipping punter, and a kicker good from 60+ you might have a chance. But that means you basically have to recreate Saban's Bama in the NFL and that's impossible... and Bryce couldn't win a championship in that environment either. What the Panthers didn't realize when they got so obsessed with his "PG mentality" was that what they were looking st was a "barely checks the box PG". The basketball equivalent of Bryce would be an undersized PG with marginal athleticism who can make the basic plays but adds nothing to the team in terms of elevating the overall team. Not a great shooter, not a great defender, not a great driver. Just a guy who can basically get you into the offense and be a matador on defense. Basically a placeholder while you look to upgrade the PG position. 
×
×
  • Create New...