Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who's Going To Be The One To Do This To Sherman?


t96

Recommended Posts

 

No this is not another Steve Smith thread. This is a "who will bring the attitude to Seattle on Sunday?" thread. Luke's going to be ready to fight after being out for a month. TD's going to love to make Graham is b*tch again. But who on the other side of the ball will bring that attitude? Of course Norwell has it but I don't see him getting in their heads. Teddy Ginn gonna punk them after catching one deep? Thor gonna get feisty? Cam gonna stiff arm Chancellor to the ground on his way to the endzone while flashing his million dollar smile? Whaddaya say?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sherman doesn't switch sides or follow receivers. It's very easy to line a dummy receiver across from him, throw to other guys and make him irrelevant to the game. That's why he almost never gets thrown at, it's not because he's this unbeatable lockdown corner that he hypes himself up to be.

In the Super Bowl, New England put Brandon LaFell across from him all game long just so they could ignore that matchup and let Edelman and Gronk shred the rest of their D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KB would be the only one to come close...or Cam if he ever somehow got near him 1 on 1 like in a run or something. Thing with KB is he usually gets flagged or looked at harder since he's so much bigger.(seems that way to me anyway)

Cam is not like any other QB and mixes it up in the scrum when things break out which is great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...