Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Calling a penalty after a review

chknwing

By chknwing,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

CoastalCat Newbie

CoastalCat

Posted
Posted

I don't think I have ever seen a review that resulted in a penalty being called.  And it happened twice last night.  you sure as hell cant challenge a penalty and have it reversed.  Very odd.

It was weird. I guess the fact that they threw the flag, then picked it up, meant that a reversal of the no-call was a call. I suppose it did get to the right place. It was pass interference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chknwing Grand Master

chknwing

Posted
  • Author
Posted

It was weird. I guess the fact that they threw the flag, then picked it up, meant that a reversal of the no-call was a call. I suppose it did get to the right place. It was pass interference.

I can agree with that but the sideline catch that resulted in a penalty that was never called originally?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jase Apprentice

Jase

Posted
Posted

So last night, We had:

a butt-interception,

the ground causing an interception,

a pass interference after review that occured a split second before the ball hit the ground 7 yards away,

an illegal touch penalty that came after review,

and two interceptions that hit the ground that should've been reviewed but weren't

 

Let's just call this a weird fuging game

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tiger7_88 Experienced

tiger7_88

Posted
Posted

It was weird. I guess the fact that they threw the flag, then picked it up, meant that a reversal of the no-call was a call. I suppose it did get to the right place. It was pass interference.

It was NOT pass interference lol.

For their to be PI, the pass has to be catchable... that ball landed 10 ft away from the receiver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
osd22 Enthusiast

osd22

Posted
Posted

It was NOT pass interference lol.

For their to be PI, the pass has to be catchable... that ball landed 10 ft away from the receiver.

But if Luke hadn`t smacked the guy to the ground he would have made a five yard diving catch. LOL ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CoastalCat Newbie

CoastalCat

Posted
Posted

So last night, We had:

a butt-interception,

the ground causing an interception,

a pass interference after review that occured a split second before the ball hit the ground 7 yards away,

an illegal touch penalty that came after review,

and two interceptions that hit the ground that should've been reviewed but weren't

 

Let's just call this a weird fuging game

Having trouble arguing with the PI call. In stride, I think the receiver would have gotten there if he hadn't been pushed. Anyone have a gif?

EDIT: To clarify, I was talking about the one down the right sideline, not the one that was deep in Eagles territory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • L-TownCat
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By L-TownCat · Posted

      So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Khyber53
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Khyber53
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...