Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can we keep the band together for 2016?


PoundCat

Recommended Posts

I have been thinking about the future of the team, and I know a few names have been thrown around as possible cuts for next year, but now I'm wondering if they have since proved themselves as too valuable to let go. I'm thinking of Stewart, Tolbert, CJ, and J Allen. I personally would love to see all 4 come back next year based on how they have performed this year (when healthy), but can we afford to keep them all with our cap situation?

I would appreciate your thoughts, huddlers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if DG had made the big FA deals that some wanted, then there would be no chance. Only so much coin to go around. Spend it on the guys that have made us 7-0. If they can restructure a few, then they can keep more than they lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PoundCat said:

I have been thinking about the future of the team, and I know a few names have been thrown around as possible cuts for next year, but now I'm wondering if they have since proved themselves as too valuable to let go. I'm thinking of Stewart, Tolbert, CJ, and J Allen. I personally would love to see all 4 come back next year based on how they have performed this year (when healthy), but can we afford to keep them all with our cap situation?

I would appreciate your thoughts, huddlers.

You seem to think our cap will be a problem next year. Why is that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, O-Ther said:

You seem to think our cap will be a problem next year. Why is that?

For one, Jared Allen's $11 million cap hit will be on our books instead of Chicago's. We can also anticipate Norman's hit to be much higher next year as well, leaving less room for the large contracts of JA, CJ and Stew. I'm sure nippleshorts has a plan for all this, I'm just wondering if those 4 vets are in the plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, PoundCat said:

For one, Jared Allen's $11 million cap hit will be on our books instead of Chicago's. We can also anticipate Norman's hit to be much higher next year as well, leaving less room for the large contracts of JA, CJ and Stew. I'm sure nippleshorts has a plan for all this, I'm just wondering if those 4 vets are in the plan.

You're working with wrong numbers and info. We will NOT be over the cap next year even with Jared's $8.5 million contract. We have $16.5 million in cap space WITH Jared, CJ, Stewie, and Kalil not having their contracts re-done.

Btw, that doesn't take into account the extra cap we'll rollover from this year. About $4.5 million right now if we don't make any more roster moves. Yes, the $16.5 million figure does assume the cap goes up from $144 million this year to $150 million next year, but it did go up more from last year to this year, and the NFL isn't losing money.

So, short answer, they're probably coming back next year even with Josh's blockbuster deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As to the topic, yeah there will be some turnover, and chances are that we will lose somebody we would prefer to keep (no way to know who). That happens in the NFL on an annual basis.

The hope is always that the overall result is at least equal or improved over the previous year.

The two most important players on the team are signed long term, so that helps. There are definitely other teams who would like to be in that position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The term you're looking for is "malinger(ed)", and he didn't.  I'm not sure why Panthers fans act like jaded ex girlfriends.  The dude is clearly injury prone as his time in San Fransico also proves. It's not like he got to San Fran and stopped having problems.
    • My long and rambling post:   The guy is all heart, and I wouldn’t be surprised if he came back even better next year. He’s exactly the guy you lock up. The money won’t ever change the way he plays.  It was a big fumble, but what 1,000 yard back fumbles once in an entire season?  Pride. This team is FINALLY seeing guys who obviously take the game very seriously. Hunt, Chuba, Thielen, Brown, Horn (CB), Coker, Bryce (IMHO). Bye bye, Spider-Man. I don’t see these dudes being OK with teammates half-assing practice or in games. I can see Brown and Horn coming over to talk to somebody.  Good team? Ummm, maybe, but will still likely lose more close games than they win unless this last draft turns in to LOB part 2. That’s a stretch.  Pretty good/decent team. Yes. They finished the season as a pretty good team. I know I sound like a broken record harping back to it, but going in to ATL and putting a 40 burger on them en route to an OT win. A bad Panthers team would have had their brakes beaten off. We’ve seen it.  Rose colored glasses on and bonging a 40 of hopium: There are watershed moments that occur that change the course of franchises, both good and bad. If Fox doesn’t pull Rodney at halftime, the epic journey that was 2003 never happens. On the negative side, Cam taking that one hit from Watt was the end of any and all Panthers relevancy and we’ve been the biggest losers in all of pro sports as a result. Watershed moments. LOB draft. Vinny goes down and the goat is born.  Will the ATL game be the spark that this franchise has desperately needed? Could it be that they hit the mega million jackpot with Princley and Scourton as eat QBs for breakfast? Sure would be nice having 2 all-pro edge guys on the cheap for the next 4 years.  A lot of unknowns, but at least it actually feels  fun again. 
    • Ok LT and Petersen are a cut above everyone else to me cmc and Faulk are interchangeable on this list.  though Faulk was better career wise
×
×
  • Create New...