Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trouble in Hollywood... Apparently major actor has been HIV positive for years .


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

The name of the actor is a secret but he's a well known actor and womanizer and has been HIV positive for years.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/celebrities/73945919/hollywood-superstar-hid-hiv-diagnosis-reports

Quote

 

A British newspaper has all but named a major A-list actor reportedly diagnosed with HIV, drawing ire from health campaigners.

The star, described as "a womaniser", has known of his HIV-positive status for years, but had not revealed his diagnosis to his sexual partners, Britain's The Sun reports.

The newspaper said it had chosen not to name the actor, who has previously dated movie and television stars, a glamour model and Hollywood personalities.

His lawyers were said to be bracing for potential legal action over his failure to disclose his HIV status.

"The reality is that if he's knowingly put women at risk then that's disgusting and it's only a matter of time before that becomes public," a source told The Sun.

Another source said friends had encouraged the man to go public before he was named by media, but he was worried about the impact on his career.

 

Many people screaming Charlie Sheen but nothing is know and media is digging all over it.  The name will leak sooner or later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Care" would be a stretch, other than the level to which I'd care about any human being.

"Curiosity" would best describe my reaction to this story, and not necessarily huge curiosity.

Once the name comes out - as I'm sure it will - I'll probably say "oh okay" and then go on.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JakeR6 said:

While there's a great risk of him passing HIV to females, it's very unlikely that a female gave him HIV. It's possible, but unlikely. He most likely contracted the virus by using a dirty drug needle or having sex with a male.

Drug use probably covers 90% of Hollywood and the only 'A list' celebrities that I recall hearing gay rumors about are Will Smith and John Travolta.

 

Blood transfusions were a large part of people getting HIV back in the 80's.   I'll take a guess and say Sean Connery! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...