Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trouble in Hollywood... Apparently major actor has been HIV positive for years .


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

The name of the actor is a secret but he's a well known actor and womanizer and has been HIV positive for years.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/celebrities/73945919/hollywood-superstar-hid-hiv-diagnosis-reports

Quote

 

A British newspaper has all but named a major A-list actor reportedly diagnosed with HIV, drawing ire from health campaigners.

The star, described as "a womaniser", has known of his HIV-positive status for years, but had not revealed his diagnosis to his sexual partners, Britain's The Sun reports.

The newspaper said it had chosen not to name the actor, who has previously dated movie and television stars, a glamour model and Hollywood personalities.

His lawyers were said to be bracing for potential legal action over his failure to disclose his HIV status.

"The reality is that if he's knowingly put women at risk then that's disgusting and it's only a matter of time before that becomes public," a source told The Sun.

Another source said friends had encouraged the man to go public before he was named by media, but he was worried about the impact on his career.

 

Many people screaming Charlie Sheen but nothing is know and media is digging all over it.  The name will leak sooner or later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Care" would be a stretch, other than the level to which I'd care about any human being.

"Curiosity" would best describe my reaction to this story, and not necessarily huge curiosity.

Once the name comes out - as I'm sure it will - I'll probably say "oh okay" and then go on.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JakeR6 said:

While there's a great risk of him passing HIV to females, it's very unlikely that a female gave him HIV. It's possible, but unlikely. He most likely contracted the virus by using a dirty drug needle or having sex with a male.

Drug use probably covers 90% of Hollywood and the only 'A list' celebrities that I recall hearing gay rumors about are Will Smith and John Travolta.

 

Blood transfusions were a large part of people getting HIV back in the 80's.   I'll take a guess and say Sean Connery! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Lol Atlanta looks to have lost their young edge rusher, has no 1st round pick, a complete mess at QB, a new coaching staff… And we swept them this year. Says what they think of us. 
    • I mean, you can only go so far with the propping up. When a guy's numbers are as bad overall as Bryce's you have to try to find specific niches to sell. It's just funny that they're honing in on where he's probably weakest to try to prop him up. Whether it's a pro-Bryce conspiracy or not, it echos my chief complaint about PFF's analysis for years. When your purely statistical analysis badly skews from the eye test of actually watching the games, it should be screaming at you that you need to modify your system not double down on it. PFF is awesome at compiling stats but their grade systems are highly flawed and they never seem to try to improve them.
    • Then why is Byce also last in other PFF stats?  The deep ball thrower stat by PFF can simply be flawed vs some conspiracy trying to prop up a QB on a team that a former employee now works for.  Both of these guys were also hired AFTER the Panthers had already drafted Bryce.  Trying to prop him up with a made up stat while he struggled would be a detriment to their own team honestly.  
×
×
  • Create New...