Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Packers...


t96

Recommended Posts

Lions aren't gonna make it in the playoffs. Cardinals were the team that scared me the most before Johnson went down for the year. They still would pose a real threat with that strong defense. Seahawks worried me before Graham went down and that secondary stopped playing at an elite (or even good) level. The Giants kind of worry me, since in 2007 they won it all against the Pats as a wild card team and in 2011 they took out the Packers in Lambeau after the Packers went 15-1 with a first round bye.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

We got up on them early too. They're still dangerous.

We're 11-0. Lions are 4-7. Yes they've clearly improved recently but this Green Bay team is just flat out terrible on both sides of the ball. Both their lines are terrible, receivers can't separate or catch the ball and the secondary is garbage. They aren't dangerous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

We're 11-0. Lions are 4-7. Yes they've clearly improved recently but this Green Bay team is just flat out terrible on both sides of the ball. Both their lines are terrible, receivers can't separate or catch the ball and the secondary is garbage. They aren't dangerous.

Disagree. I'd still consider them a tough team.

I will give you that their offensive line is overrated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, pantherphan96 said:

Lions aren't gonna make it in the playoffs. Cardinals were the team that scared me the most before Johnson went down for the year. They still would pose a real threat with that strong defense. Seahawks worried me before Graham went down and that secondary stopped playing at an elite (or even good) level. The Giants kind of worry me, since in 2007 they won it all against the Pats as a wild card team and in 2011 they took out the Packers in Lambeau after the Packers went 15-1 with a first round bye.

Just checking to see if you were worried.   Just joking with you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, pantherphan96 said:

Lions aren't gonna make it in the playoffs. Cardinals were the team that scared me the most before Johnson went down for the year. They still would pose a real threat with that strong defense. Seahawks worried me before Graham went down and that secondary stopped playing at an elite (or even good) level. The Giants kind of worry me, since in 2007 they won it all against the Pats as a wild card team and in 2011 they took out the Packers in Lambeau after the Packers went 15-1 with a first round bye.

Johnson is designated to return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Correct this logic I might if it meant taking his guaranteed money now and spread it over 3 years (2026-2028) and maybe add $6m.  I am not sure you can do that, or that he would do it, but it would be a way for him to extend his career and bank accounts and we would be getting him for $6m for 2 years (if healthy), basically, since his entire salary is guaranteed now.  If not, we lose an additional $6m spread over 2 years.  So let's say his guaranteed $$ for 2026 is $18m.  Give him a $24m contract ($8m per) through 2028.  Worst case:  We get $10m in cap relief now and create $3m dead cap for 2 years (2027-8).   Best case?  We get cap relief now and a good/decent guard/tackle for 2 years (2027-2028) and the total salary per year when he is active would be $12m if you don't count any money for the season he cannot play.  That is a good value, and we'd basically be getting a 50% discount rate.  Since we have so much guaranteed now, extending him is not as crazy as it seems.   Something has to be wrong with this logic...      
    • I don't disagree about Nikishin's potential availability, but Hamilton as a replacement? Not an upgrade in my book.
×
×
  • Create New...