Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So can we just call this 16 game winning streak...


teeray

Recommended Posts

I am not aure what to call winning an entire regular season's worth of games in a row. I have narrowed down to two

Panther Slam

Or 

The Cam Slam

Panther Slam makes more sense, because it has been a total team effort, and DA actually started one of the games in the 16 game winning streak

However, my rebuttal to that would be.... The Cam Slam rhymes.

How about you guys?  Have you come up with an appropriate name for the 16 game winning streak?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly I think the whole "regular season winning streak" thing is pretty stupid. It completely ignores the fact that we lost a game that was more important than any of the 16 wins. To me it's a 12 game winning streak. If we want 16 then win the next 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Bartin said:

Honestly I think the whole "regular season winning streak" thing is pretty stupid. It completely ignores the fact that we lost a game that was more important than any of the 16 wins. To me it's a 12 game winning streak. If we want 16 then win the next 4.

Okay

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Bartin said:

Honestly I think the whole "regular season winning streak" thing is pretty stupid. It completely ignores the fact that we lost a game that was more important than any of the 16 wins. To me it's a 12 game winning streak. If we want 16 then win the next 4.

Party pooper!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Bartin said:

Honestly I think the whole "regular season winning streak" thing is pretty stupid. It completely ignores the fact that we lost a game that was more important than any of the 16 wins. To me it's a 12 game winning streak. If we want 16 then win the next 4.

Its a record the NFL keeps just like running TDs for QBs. I will celebrate this just as hard as Cam setting that record. Neither one really means anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This was the first time I’ve seen him play. Very impressive guy. Does he play well within structure as well? You can’t live on out of structure play in the NFL.
    • But they exist in that space precisely because they were the outliers with big arms and other elite traits(especially athletically). I would never look past a sub 6 foot QB with a similar profile to those guys. That's basically what I mean. My list of prospects is never going to auto delete based on stature. It's definitely a reason to take a more in depth look to make sure they are going to translate. Bryce fooled me with his playmaking ability. I thought it was going to translate well, ignored all his throwing mechanics issues and gave more credit to his abilities than the superstar team around him. I am not going to do that again.
    • I agree but the 1 and a half guys that have fit is a small hit percentage. I agree the other stuff matters more. If Murray wasn't a dud between the ears it would be 2 and not 1 in that category. It's deffinatly not as high as ability, tools and skills.  Yeah really weak arm is a huge red flag. Paired with poor footwork should be a hell no.
×
×
  • Create New...