Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What Giants Fans Are Saying


Jeremy Igo
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think this will definitely be a good game especially with the premier matchup of Josh Norman vs Odell Beckham. The Panthers have a few injuries going into this game  but I still don't think we take our eyes off the prize and lose the focus we have maintained throughout this season. As long as we keep playing hard physical Carolina football we can definitely pull out this game with a win. I'm excited for this game just keep pounding Panthers! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Bronn said:

NOPE! I don't have him, but I've sat Julio Jones and other people when they face our defense. If I had OBJ he'd be on the bench this week. 8 catches 92 yards max. Decent stats in a PPR league, but most people will have better options this week.

Hope so.  I am against him in my league and have the Panthers DEF.  I need something good to happen with the news today that I will have to win without Luck and Stew

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO this is Normans biggest test yet, the Giants offense is playing at a much higher level than the Falcons or should I say Eli, but he puts up his fair share of turds.  I would like to see norman shadow Odell the whole game, although Randle and Harris are both capable receivers.  We will find out how dire our CBs(not named norman) situation is after this ball game.  Hopefully our pass rush shows out and they should.  The cluster fug of backfield in NY doesn't scare anyone.

Edited by Diehardpanther02
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, MadHatter said:

I don't think so. 

We will keep doing what we have been doing all season.....why in the world would we change our offensive philosophy when we are playing the 32nd ranked defense in the NFL.

Being without the #3 RB in the league, that you've had all year as your workhorse, is no loss to scoff at. 

Stewart's a solid 1/3 of our offense.

Edited by TheNewStandard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Diehardpanther02 said:

IMO this is Normans biggest test yet, the Giants offense is playing at a much higher level than the Falcons or should I say Eli, but he puts up his fair share of turds.  I would like to see norman shadow Odell the whole game, although Randle and Harris are both capable receivers.  We will find out how dire our CBs(not named norman) situation is after this ball game.  Hopefully our pass rush shows out and they should.  The cluster fug of backfield in NY doesn't scare anyone.

I think Eli and the gnats are par with ATL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, TheNewStandard said:

Being without the #3 RB in the league, that you've had all year as your workhorse, is no loss to scoff at. 

Stewart's a solid 1/3 of our offense.

Stewart is a great RB.  But, our run game will NOT suffer with Tolbert, Fozzy, and CAP running the ball against this god awful Giants defense.

NY will score 17-20 points (with OBJ making a couple of big plays).  Problem is that this offense is rolling and will put up 30+ again AGAINST THE WORST DEFENSE IN THE LEAGUE. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MadHatter said:

Stewart is a great RB.  But, our run game will NOT suffer with Tolbert, Fozzy, and CAP running the ball against this god awful Giants defense.

NY will score 17-20 points (with OBJ making a couple of big plays).  Problem is that this offense is rolling and will put up 30+ again AGAINST THE WORST DEFENSE IN THE LEAGUE. 

I think part of the fact that the offense is rolling is because stewart is able to pick up positive yardage on almost every run.  Hes hard to bring down.  Teams have to compensate and stack the line to try and stop him from grinding out 10 yards every 3 plays.  I'm not sure the other backs will be able to do the same.  If teams dont have to bring in an extra player to the line to help with the run they can drop that player back into coverage which would help against carolinas passing attack.  Stewarts not flashy but carolina needs those yards he grinds out.

Edited by chknwing
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, chknwing said:

I think part of the fact that the offense is rolling is because stewart is able to pick up positive yardage on almost every run.  Hes hard to bring down.  Teams have to compensate and stack the line to try and stop him from grinding out 10 yards every 3 plays.  I'm not sure the other backs will be able to do the same.  If teams dont have to bring in an extra player to the line to help with the run they can drop that player back into coverage which would help against carolinas passing attack.  Stewarts not flashy but carolina needs those yards he grinds out.

I do not think we will have any dropoff in run production in this game....their defense is just that bad.

If this was against a good D, I would be worried a little.  But, against the Giants D.....not worried.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MadHatter said:

I do not think we will have any dropoff in run production in this game....their defense is just that bad.

If this was against a good D, I would be worried a little.  But, against the Giants D.....not worried.

This. Their best pass rusher has a permanent oven mitt on his hand. I wouldn't want to go against our offensive line with a handicap like that. If this were to become a shoot out, we've got a lot better ammo, so I'm not greatly concerned. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm interested to see how successful all of our replacement players are in this game. I feel like we underestimate our scheme and play calling on both sides of the ball...in other words, I think more of our success comes from the players executing the play calls rather than from having a bunch of talented players. Then, when you have great talent at certain positions (QB, DL, LB, CB) executing good play calls, those players become all-pro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...