Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sinking the Battleship Yamato: a case study of evolution, innovation, and revolution in the NFC South

PhillyB

By PhillyB,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

PhillyB Grand Master

PhillyB

Posted
  • Author
Posted
16 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

Yamashiro.

The Kirishima was sunk by the USS Washington at Guadalcanal.

yeah i mean yamashiro

just spent the last hour perusing wikipedia's list of all IJN ships ever commissioned and used during the war... so engrossing. i was wrong about the mutsu, it was the kongo that got down by a sub. also i had forgotten the shinano was actually originally laid down as the 3rd yamato class battleship but was ordered to be converted to a carrier once the four flat tops went down at midway

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tiger7_88 Experienced

tiger7_88

Posted
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, cookinwithgas said:

Dude you don't even know how all up in this I am, but I am going to wait to read it until I have some free quiet time. Maybe I'll break out my complete Japanese DVD set of the series to accompany it.

Love discussing these things with y'all.

I've been reading and studying WW2 in the Pacific (and, to a lesser extent, the ETO) since my Mom let me joint the Military Book Club back in 1974 when I was in the 7th grade.

I might have a few years on y'all... lol.

Edit: First book I ever got was 'The Two-Ocean War' by Samuel Eliot Morison, a one-volume abridgment of his multi-volume 'History of United States Naval Operations in WW2'.

Edited by tiger7_88
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Paa Langfart Grand Master

Paa Langfart

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, PhillyB said:

yep i think it was largely the west virginia that kicked kirishima's ass

My navigation instructor when I went to Naval OCS,  was in the Nevada at Pearl Harbor.  She was the only BB that got underway that day and he was aboard.  He was in the twighlight of his naval career when I met him in 1982, having put in over 40 years of service at that time - he was a CWO4.  One day in class in reply to a candidates question,  he told us just a tiny bit about that day. I  watched tears fall from his eyes as he  remembered and told us about it.  

He wrote this book,  which I bought at the base bookstore - I regret that I didnt have him sign it for me.  Probably not the best book you'll ever read,  but a first hand account of a guy who was there and I feel honored to have known him.

 

http://www.amazon.com/Battleship-Pearl-Harbor-1941-Underway/dp/0898650933/ref=sr_1_fkmr0_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1450991331&sr=1-1-fkmr0&keywords=exum+uss+west+virginia+pearl+harbor

Edited by Paa Langfart
  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PhillyB Grand Master

PhillyB

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, UpstatePanther said:

@PhillyB this has been one of the most educational threads I have ever read on the Huddle. Thanks bro, and thanks to all the others that have added interesting tidbits of history to the discussion. I've thoroughly enjoyed reading it. So pumped to see the Yamato go down in person thus weekend! 

Will you be there Philly?

sadly no, it turns out 2 year olds are extremely expensive to christmas shop for

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      2026 World Cup Thread

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • TD alt
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • rebelrouser
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...