Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CJ is a class act


FutureDynasty

Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, thebigcat said:

you are confusing CJ the person for CJ the player....

 

From what I have read, CJ the person is an awesome and funny dude

From what I have seen on the field, CJ the player is not playing up to his contract stature 

Our fan base really doesn't understand the difference, it's so sad. Barring extremes (see Hardy, Rice etc.) charity work and all this other bullshit is none sense to me.

 

im a big 'good person fan', and where I go to find those heroes....isn't the NFL, and it's sad to think anyone does. 

 

who gives a fug, he's overpaid and needs to be dropped from the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CJ is having a down year thus-far, but lets not forget all the years that he was a huge part of its success.  He still has time to be a major impact at the crucial moment of a crucial game.  Maybe he will get the sack that will win the Super Bowl?  I think that its premature to give up on him at this time and we should remember all that he has done on the field over the years.  Hope he gets its going and puts the talk about his on field production to bed.  Lastly I think its great that he did that nice gesture for families in the Charlotte community.    How can anybody act like it doesn't matter because it definitely mattered to the families lives that he touched.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
    • You're really gonna pass up the opportunity to make a joke about skidmarks in underwear here?  Alright fine.
×
×
  • Create New...