Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ok, these headphones are nice.


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, VerticalThreat said:

Question I've always wondered: I keep my music on my phone, so do these guys use MP3 players or their phones? Seems like if they used their phones they'd be getting a lot of texts, calls, etc. (hard to focus). Just thinking out loud.

Flight Mode? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bluetooth compresses and converts the source audio codec so it will never sound as good as the original source. With that said if your source isn't great to begin with, (Pandora, bad mp3 rip, etc) then you probably will never notice a difference. Get a pair of studio headphones and a solid headphone amp and prepare to be blown away.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not an audiophile like some of you seem to be or my brother, but I don't have any issue with quality bluetooth headphones. I have a pair of Martin Logan over ear headphones, a pair of v-moda crossfade's, and my most recent acquisition is Jaybird blue bud x's. The first two are corded and have SOMEWHAT better quality (actually the v-modas are just plain filthy good) than the jaybirds but the jaybirds hold their own remarkably well I think. I don't have any issues with them at all worth complaining about. And they are absolutely perfect for working out, wandering around the house doing chores, etc. I hate getting cords snagged on everything i walk by. 

 

just sayin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No review on the hit of Chatfield. 
    • How would he get ahead of Aaron Rodgers? Rodgers is at a nearly 69% completion rate w/ 17 TDs to 5 INTs.   Comfortably ahead of Bryce in every statistical aspect of he position.  I get Rodgers is old as dirt but.....the production is pretty significantly better. 
    • I hear you, the sense of anger and resentment on the Huddle is bad even by Huddle Standards... I've tried to be pretty measured on Bryce lately.  I want him to succeed.  And I do think he does some things well, and makes plays.  When he throws with anticipation, things look good.   The problem is we're not seeing Bama Bryce anymore.  We drafted Bama Bryce.  We get 5.0 YPA Bryce.  It's not exciting football.  I love the wins, so I don't care that much about how pretty things are.  The reality is fantasy football and sports gambling have overrun many people's perspectives on football and sports at large.  Most fans want to see the big plays down the field for their own excitement.  Most knowledgeable fans want to see it as a way to keep a D honest, close the door on an opponent, and just better execute good football. Remember the old Bill Belichick expression: "Stats are for losers."  I'd much rather have ugly wins than pretty losses.  But I can still enjoy a pretty loss on the HOPE that next time we'll get that bounce of luck our way.   Wins and losses are often stated as a QB stat when football is a team game.  We saw how Flacco has a career day but the Cincy D let him down.  Does that loss count against Flacco?  It shouldn't because W/L should be a Head Coach stat. As far as game winning drives as a stat, it's not overly important.  It's cool, certainly so.  It's also a team stat.  If WRs don't catch the ball, if OL don't block, etc it's a moot point anyway.  Like we had in Philly last year.  Ideally, you shouldn't be in that position at the end of the game. Now as far as Bryce himself, I want him to do well.  I want him to take the position of franchise QB instead of have it placed gently upon his head.  I just don't think he's that guy.  We'll finish this season with Bryce, and if he proves he's the guy and puts us in a winning position, great.  If not, then we bring in competition for him.  Or we trade him.
×
×
  • Create New...