Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dave Gettleman: "We need more speed on the field"


PanthersGOATFan336

Recommended Posts

In the end of year presser last year our GM said we need to get more speed on the field yet 2 components of our secondary may be two of the slowest on the TEAM:

http://www.foxsports.com/carolinas/story/carolina-panthers-gm-dave-gettleman-looking-for-speed-in-offseason-011315

Quote

Gettleman and head coach Ron Rivera, who spoke before Gettleman did, each acknowledged that the team is slow and needs to gain speed across the board, especially at wide receiver. 

"Ron and I have talked the last couple days, and we'd like to get faster," Gettleman said. "We need more speed, we know that. We're not silly. We're not going to miss the obvious. You want to upgrade every position, everywhere. If you're not getting better, you're getting worse."

7792.png Age 33

0807PANTHERS_01.JPG Age 34

We have Tre Boston why not try him the last game and see what he's got if not anything he's faster...as for corner why not give the guy we signed a try in the final game also. I would to a degree use the last game as a tryout for the playoffs.

 

What say you huddle?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've said it all year... my biggest worry about this team is the lack of speed in the secondary. The teams we will likely see in the playoffs (Seattle and Arizona) both have burners at the WR position and the quarterbacks to get them the ball. Without a pass-rush they will be dead in the water back there when the likes of John Brown, Floyd, Lockett, Kearse, and Baldwin come to town. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Kevin Greene said:

BTW, how many MLBs do you think would be back there defending on Julio on that TD play? We have a lot of speed on D.

Not many at all, and by the way he was a MLB that broke up the very first pass against Beckham last week. He drew a penalty but saved a potential TD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...