Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

They're scared


PandaPancake

Recommended Posts

Over at the Broncos forum they are already talking about strength of schedule being such a factor to this game.

 

Quote

They played most of their games against the weakest divisions. Here's a site that considers not only opponents won-lost records, but average margin of victory and won-lost records of opponents of a team's opponents. It ranks our strength of schedule 13th and Carolina's 31st. All of this may be worth considering when looking at that 17-1 record the Panthers have achieved.

http://www.predictionmachine.com/Str...edule-Rankings

When you look at the link provided that claims were 31st it says were 27th. They really think this team is full of slouches and Von Miller is their savior.

http://www.orangemane.com/BB/showthread.php?t=121678

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Yup. This and prior Super Bowl experience is going to be our biggest edge going in. Theirs is the QB position and overall athleticism.

lmfao As if we don't have the larger advantage according to this guy. Telling the truth but not recognizing it. Derp.

Quote

That said, Seattle and Arizona did implode and basically give them those games. 

What. We didn't play these last 2 games?

I see you there Panda. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, GRWatcher said:

lmfao As if we don't have the larger advantage according to this guy. Telling the truth but not recognizing it. Derp.

What. We didn't play these last 2 games?

I see you there Panda. lol

Yeah, I joined after John Fox left. They do good things in the community even with a linebacker that wants to be a DE but doesn't have enough weight on him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Khaki Lackey said:

Because of the field conditions! (in the first half) 

There is always an excuse.

I know it's been said a bajillion times here, but you just can't get around it: BOTH TEAMS PLAYED ON THE SAME FIELD. What a friggin weak excuse. If you want to play on a field in the condition that you prefer, win enough games for homefield advantage. It's called homefield advantage for a reason. They didn't just make up that term for funsies. 

Are Pats fans complaining that the Denver air is too thin for their team? Or are they more reasonable because they have more experience?

Sorry, not trying to derail the thread. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CarolinaSunday said:

I know it's been said a bajillion times here, but you just can't get around it: BOTH TEAMS PLAYED ON THE SAME FIELD. What a friggin weak excuse. If you want to play on a field in the condition that you prefer, win enough games for homefield advantage. It's called homefield advantage for a reason. They didn't just make up that term for funsies. 

Are Pats fans complaining that the Denver air is too thin for their team? Or are they more reasonable because they have more experience?

Sorry, not trying to derail the thread. 

I know. I was being sarcastic. People can justify anything to make themselves feel better

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go ahead and say we had a soft schedule. I guess playoff games don't count in their eyes because the Panthers played a lot better teams than the Broncos in the playoffs and they barely beat both teams.

Everyone agreed the NFC playoff field was much stronger than the AFC field. Many experts predicted Arizona and Seattle to win the Super Bowl. We crushed Arizona and we would have crushed Seattle but the coaching staff decided to get conservative and decided to play the clock and not the Seahawks in the second half with such a large lead. They showed against Arizona they wont make that mistake again. I am sure they will not let up against Denver.

Panthers are balanced running and throwing. Neither the Steelers nor the Patriots had a good running game due to injuries. This helped the Broncos defense attack the QB because they knew they would pass. They will not have this luxury against Panthers. I guess Bronco fans do not realize this part of the equation.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When Cam is playing well, which is the vast majority of time, we have an extremely explosive offense. Our defense is solid and experienced. Denver's offense is led by a QB whose arm has turned into a wet noodle due to his age, and as a result their offense sputters along and often stalls even when things are going well. Their defense is solid and experienced.

It doesn't take a football genius to make a prediction that we're going to beat the poo out of them, and their fans know it. No one really cares about strength of schedule. They've seen our team destroy the top teams in the NFL. They know what is coming. A giant is coming to stomp on their village, and they need a narrative that is going to make them feel better about it. It's still going to hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think you misunderstand what I mean by "significantly better than Bryce Young." That gets you entry into the top 30 NFL starting QB's. Not sure if you have seen that group recently, but it's not a strong one the further down that list you go. Murray is a Tier 3 if not Tier 4 QB in my book.
    • Here is where you are… for purely the sake of arguing with me you are willing to suggest the 2025 Saints RBs might not be better than the 2025 Panthers RBs lol Saints have the 28th ranked rush attack.  We are top 10.   The Saints haven’t had a 100 yard rusher the entire season.  We have seen franchise best performances in a franchise known for running the rock. and see above for what our OL is also clearly better than the Saints.  Hell, Canales being forced into some mashups has often made it even stronger at times 
    • I am not saying there isn't truth to that but the economics and reality of the NFL are producing that. It's very hard to justify taking a guy in the 1st round, shelving him for years, having to make a contract extension and THEN hoping it all turns out okay. Not to mention, imagine that scenario after what we traded for Bryce. One thing is for certain, the QB desperation has led to bad 1st round QB picks for 15+ years now. That ain't new.  I think we need to decide on Bryce's future this offseason and we will have to. In my eyes, picking up the 5th year option is the "all-in" move for a two year period. That means you are committed to him in the medium term. Not the move I would personally make.  No matter what the decision is, I have been vocal about needing to bring in multiple QB's to improve that QB room for when Bryce falters again. How about just overall improving your team depth so that when it doesn't pan out, you at least have options on the roster? I don't feel like that is too much to ask and it's a valid bet hedge. 
×
×
  • Create New...