Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A Critical Look at the Denver Defense


shaka

Recommended Posts

This is in response to this article attempting to discredit our offense based on opposing defenses:

http://www.milehighreport.com/2016/1/27/10846346/a-critical-look-at-the-panthers-offense

I'm using the same idea that the author does showing that Denver benefited from playing worse offensive teams than the Panthers.

Here are the statistical ranks of the offenses Denver played with averages at the bottom:

denver.JPG.2626b2fa2d6d0179eca01b3270191

Here are the statistical ranks of the offenses Carolina played with averages at the bottom:

carolina.JPG.b55ea475bc353b87bfc7677d4a2

On average, the Broncos played easier offenses.  And lastly the defensive ranks and totals of the Broncos and Panthers:

Denver:  
Pass 1st - 3193 yards
Rush 3rd - 1337 yards
Total 1st - 4530 yards
Scoring 4th - 296 points

Carolina: 
Pass 11th - 3752 yards
Rush 4th - 1415 yards
Total 6th - 5167 yards
Scoring 6th - 308 points
 

Takeaways:  

  • Denver played on average, weaker passing and running opponents then Carolina
  • Difference between this "Elite" Denver defense and ours is...559 passing yards, 78 rushing yards and 8 points
  • The Denver defense is great, our offense is good great.  Our defense is great, their offense is not very good.  
  • fug Seattle, New Orleans, Atlanta and OBJ

Edit: fixed good to great for our offense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to mention that for roughly half the season we were in games where we were blowing out the other team which leads to changes in both how they play offense and how we play defense.  At how many points this season did Denver have a 3 score or more lead?  That has a huge impact on how you play defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, GRWatcher said:

I hope you voted in the poll at the end of that article. How many points does our defense limit the Panthers offense to in the Super Bowl? I voted 28+ :)

I really hope our defense doesn't limit the Panthers offense in any way shape or form.  Unless perhaps our defense scores so much that the offense can take it easy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

This Denver D might be one of the best defenses in the last 15 years. The fact that they can be number one in so many categories while having an offense that led the NFL in INT and can barely stay on the field, speaks volumes.

 

 

I get where you're going with this but from a yardage standpoint it actually helps their cause.  Look at the regular season game vs the Steelers.  Pitt had two scoring drives that result from turnovers.  Combined yards?  58. Every other scoring drive was at least 50 yards.  

 

They're a great defense and I haven't watched them enough to say they're one of the best in the last 15 years.  They could be, I don't know.  

 

But if people want to take pot shots at us saying we had a joke schedule or faced bad defenses, I'm going to call them out on playing cupcake offenses.  You lead the league in rushing defense after playing the Browns, Colts, Ravens, Chargers twice, Raiders twice, Lions and NE?  Good, you should that's 9 games against bottom of the barrel running teams.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Comments on that article are also "interesting"...

"If the Cardinals didn’t turn the ball over..."

"Seahawks completely shut down the Panthers in the second half"

"In the Divisional Round, it was a Comedy of Errors that allowed them to advance "

"AZ gave them the ball seven times! And most of those really were gifts."

"If only the Panthers first half lead wasn’t so huge..."

"The difference between the Panthers and our defense is they have depended more on turnovers to prevent scoring"

"Broncos defense would look better if we could subtract all the (Carolina) pick six scoring"

"But to spell it out, he completely melted down…those weren’t take aways, they were give aways."

"What QBs did your team pick off in the regular season…Winston, Mallett or Hoyer, Bortles, Hasselbeck, Bradford, Weeden or Mallett again, Cousins? That’s a pro bowl line up of QBs if I ever saw one."

"CAR’s defense is really good, but most of those INTs by Palmer and even Wilson in the divisional round were absolutely terrible decisions."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I really hope our defense doesn't limit the Panthers offense in any way shape or form.  Unless perhaps our defense scores so much that the offense can take it easy.

lol good one! Actually, I just copied & pasted the title of the the poll from SBNation which is why it sounds so funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CatAttack said:

Comments on that article are also "interesting"...

"If the Cardinals didn’t turn the ball over..."

"Seahawks completely shut down the Panthers in the second half"

"In the Divisional Round, it was a Comedy of Errors that allowed them to advance "

"AZ gave them the ball seven times! And most of those really were gifts."

"If only the Panthers first half lead wasn’t so huge..."

"The difference between the Panthers and our defense is they have depended more on turnovers to prevent scoring"

"Broncos defense would look better if we could subtract all the (Carolina) pick six scoring"

"But to spell it out, he completely melted down…those weren’t take aways, they were give aways."

"What QBs did your team pick off in the regular season…Winston, Mallett or Hoyer, Bortles, Hasselbeck, Bradford, Weeden or Mallett again, Cousins? That’s a pro bowl line up of QBs if I ever saw one."

"CAR’s defense is really good, but most of those INTs by Palmer and even Wilson in the divisional round were absolutely terrible decisions."

"CAR’s defense is really good, but most of those INTs by Palmer and even Wilson in the divisional round were absolutely terrible decisions."

 

Never mind that it could have been great positioning by one of our defenders. These assclowns have never watched football with an open mind. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

This Denver D might be one of the best defenses in the last 15 years. The fact that they can be number one in so many categories while having an offense that led the NFL in INT and can barely stay on the field, speaks volumes.

 

 

This

I'm getting less confident. Not to say we can't or aren't likely to win but my confidence is lessening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Cat said:

This

I'm getting less confident. Not to say we can't or aren't likely to win but my confidence is lessening.

Then go take a Prozac and relax.

This game is not going to be close....we will blow them out. Their offense is pedestrian and will STRUGGLE to score.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...