Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fallout from Norman vs Beckham


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Goodell wants two personal fouls to equal ejection

Quote

Turning it into a yellow card/red card situation would create a deterrent, or at least keep things from spiraling out of control such happened several times this year,

Specifically, the Panthers-Giants game in which Odell Beckham was flagged for spearing Panthers cornerback Josh Norman in the head would lead to him being thrown out under such a rule.

The measure will have to go through the competition committee, but should be the kind of thing that has plenty of traction.

I think three would be better myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 personal fouls the way Beckham did them warrants an ejection (I know he had 3), but there are personal foul calls that are bullsh*t so 2 does seem a little low and could get undeserving players kicked out which would be a nightmare situation for a playoff game or other big game. 3 would be good but I don't think 3 personal fouls in a game has happened a lot so I doubt it even has much of an impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Darth Biscuit said:

Eh, depends, and I don't know that this is the right solution...

Ejection is kind of a "know it when you see it" thing and the Beckham situation definitely was and they screwed it up...

Valid, but begs the question how you couldn't "know it" when you see a guy run ten yards to spear another guy helmet to helmet.

Guys screwing up is generally what gets things codified even when they shouldn't have to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean, you get a PF for a facemask, and sometimes it's obviously not blatant, and just a hand getting caught.  Especially linemen who are just grabbing whatever they can to get a stop, and don't even realize it.  The refs just need to be smart enough to know when to warrant an ejection.  In Beckham's case... the spear should have been it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nick_81 said:

I mean, you get a PF for a facemask, and sometimes it's obviously not blatant, and just a hand getting caught.  Especially linemen who are just grabbing whatever they can to get a stop, and don't even realize it.  The refs just need to be smart enough to know when to warrant an ejection.  In Beckham's case... the spear should have been it.  

I was sorry they did away with the 5 yard / 15 yard facemask thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Valid, but begs the question how you couldn't "know it" when you see a guy run ten yards to spear another guy helmet to helmet.

Guys screwing up is generally what gets things codified even when they shouldn't have to be.

True... so instead of training the refs better, they're going to institute a stupid type of "zero tolerance policy" in effect...  not all personal fouls are equal.  Are facemask penalties going to count in this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Darth Biscuit said:

True... so instead of training the refs better, they're going to institute a stupid type of "zero tolerance policy" in effect...  not all personal fouls are equal.  Are facemask penalties going to count in this?

See above.

i think restoring the 5 vs 15 yard distinction on facemask penalties would help.

And while we're at it (cough) full time refs (cough).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, imminent rogaine said:

If they did this, they would need to re-define what a personal foul is. Taunting, inadvertent late hits, inadvertent face masks, these things shouldn't be grounds for ejection. You want to limit intentional, malicious hits and plays, so only those types of plays should be "personal fouls".

 

Exactly why this is a bad idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't necessarily think he will be moved, I would currently be leaning against that notion. I think a lot will depend on the coaching situation. Carroll certainly can't be thinking about wanting to go through a serious strip down and overhaul, so the longer he plans to remain, the less likely I think Crosby gets moved.
    • I think everyone says Mike Evans because of size, but really they have different strengths and play styles.  Tmac is better on intermediate routes and not nearly as good at contested catches. 
    • At this point, it is criminal to go into the 2026 training camp/OTA's with XL penciled in as a #2 WR. The team must upgrade, either through free agency or the draft. If he cannot give 100% effort on significantly less snaps as a #4-6 WR(players like Tremayne have done that consistently) then I don't think you have a player worth rostering beyond the trade deadline. Offensively, we eventually have to upgrade to an NFL starting caliber C. It's been almost the length of time from Gross to Ikey since Kalil retired and we have below average to terrible C play. Love Mays as a BC-esque utility backup but he will never be an above average long term starting C.  The TE room is one of the worst in the NFL but it's a low usage position in this offense, so the investments are likely to be small, if any. I would never expect to see an elite TE in a Dave Canales offense. 100% agree on OL depth. We actually aren't bad there but BC will be gone, Mays is a UFA, Corbett is a UFA and Zavala has been both injured and bad. We have to bolster that depth again or resign guys like Mays and Corbett to keep that depth somewhat stable.
×
×
  • Create New...