Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Shula is in full control of the offense


Growl

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Kuechly59 said:

Two biggest plays to me the missed fg and the Denver guard holding to prevent short from blowing Anderson up in the back field giving them a fg attempt the NFL needs to make a rule for that situation it needs to be loss of down because the Broncos got the best of both worlds go for it don't get it the penalty gets accepted and they still get a fg...

I agree a loss of down is a good idea

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, tiger7_88 said:

Beyond the pale.

Really.

What a ****.

If Bum decided to drop Von Miller into deep pass coverage a majority of the game, and Von struggled to stay with receivers would that be Miller's fault for not playing well?

If Kubiak made Peyton throw deep go routes most of the game and never gave him a receiver to dump it off to within 10 yards while having no max pro, would that be Peyton's fault?

If Shula made Cam become a game manager within the pocket that had no max pro and minimized his ability to audible while making him develop deep routes against man coverage, would that be Cam's fault?

I agree with you. People need to think.

Everyone praised Shula for designing game plan's and an offense around the strengths of his players who had major limitations. Now in the biggest game of the year he goes away from all of that and forces his players to play to their weaknesses and people want to blame the players?

Sorry, the coach must know his team and what they do well. He must play to their strengths and guard against their weaknesses. This game plan was awful, and the tape will show it.

What happened to all the misdirection that has been a staple of the Panther's offense?

That WR pass looked horrible, and relying on Fozzy and Philly for a majority of the 1st half offense? Who here would ever think that would work. I know it won't work, because that kind of coaching garbage led to the Panthers 3-8-1 start in 2014.

Stick with what got you there and challenge the other team to beat it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, tiger7_88 said:

So the ability to predict the play calls from fan's couches was...

Cam's fault?

Kalil's fault?

Norwell's fault?

You sound like you'd make a great coordinator so what keeps you on these boards with us with all your wisdom and knowledge?  Surely there must be some NFL team that would look at your posts here and recognize that, no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

some of you don't understand football, how shula get's the blame is beyond me......the execution on offense was as piss poor as ever and that couple with our ST players playing two hand touch and a punt returner is majority the reason we lose.

 

we ran the ball and kept coughing up the ball, we pass and either wr;s dropped the ball or the o line IN MAX PROTECTION got abused. Dickson and Fozzy whiffing on assignments doesn't help either. These are the games i wish we had a steve smith type personality on the field someone to light a fire in the offense's ass, instead the offense just continue to fall apart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Broncos have a really good defense 

We moved the ball decently considering the opponent.  But missed a FG.  Turned it over in FG range.

Look, if we don't turn the ball over in our own 10 yard line and cover punts we win that game,  and probably comfortably with just 16 points (convert two FGs)

Some of you guys act like offensive coaching is to blame for every mistake.  Fact is, we fugged up.

But more importantly, Denver is a legit defense.  Shut down an explosive Steelers and Patriots team too.  That defensive performance by them wasn't a fluke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The honest reality is that we will never advance as a society as long as there are people who actually believe that a few isolated poor plays are more detrimental to a team than one simple minded coach being exposed after the pressure of the moment forced him back into his natural tendencies and completely neutered his unit's ability to be effective

 

 

Please take a head coaching job as soon as possible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right...I think they've done really well. No one's going to bat 1000% but they've addressed areas of need and there's no comparison to the overall talent of the team now than when DC and then Morgan got the reigns. This whole season is about seeing how much of a step up can Bryce and this team make. If Bryce can't and last year is as good as it gets for him then at least we have a talented roster for the next guy. I think we're going to be good this season 
    • I said could, not would. I recognize he has potential based on past performance. Compared to what KP has done, Howell has more potential and the physical traits to make noise. KP has small hands and a weak arm. Not something you want in even your backup QB.  I've been hammering since last off-season before we re-signed Dalton, improve the room. Other than getting younger, I don't see how anyone can say we legitimately improved the room or even tried. We might as well have signed Josh Rosen.  Dalton is still on the roster for now. That's 3 QBs unless we trade or cut him. He's still Bryce's mentor after all. Do you believe we are going to draft someone with potential and give them a legitimate opportunity to develop from the practice squad? Are we going to carry 3 QBs on the active roster? 4 for a developmental rookie? Are we going to potentially cut KP if we draft a rookie and he's outperformed? Doubtful. Cutting Dalton(if we can't trade him) and KP would be 8m in wasted cap space.  I chose Howell as an example because he showed promise in his only full season as a starter. You could plug in another name with the physical traits and potential and what i said would still apply. KP showed almost nothing and was benched. I genuinely don't care if it’s rookie pick as long as there is the potential to develop into a future NFL QB.  As much as I can't stand him, Bellichek was always developing a number 2 QB even with the GOAT as his starter. The wisdom of that was evident when Cassell came in when Brady was hurt week 1 and went 11-5 and almost made the wildcard, which 11-5 gets you almost any other year. I give credit where it's due though. Cassel and Jimmy G both came into the league as developmental QBs, potential QB1s, and went on to have careers.  You never know if you never try. KP feels like a punt in addressing the most important position on the field. Bryce has never played 2 full games of franchise QB level football back to back.  If Bryce progresses, are you ready to offer a 280m 5 year extension based off a one hit wonder year? If Bryce regresses and we need a QB in 27, are we going to trade a fortune away again to trade up to 1 to get one? Are you ready to do the past 3 years all over again?  To me, it's not about Kenny Pickett. It's about the move itself. It was a feeble attempt to improve the QB room. We better hope Bryce succeeds, because if he doesn't, we literally have no backup plan right now.   
    • IOL that early isn’t good value at all. We have a LT who might not ever be good again and a RT that might retire soon. T seems deep early in this draft, so I’d go there in the 1st. 
×
×
  • Create New...