Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Panthers to re-sign WR Stephen Hill and T Mike Remmers


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

A trio of obvious moves. Hill should be a relatively no-cost move and Alexander's career has literally gone up in smoke.  I'm interested in seeing the tender put on Remmers and if any other teams try to sign him to an offer sheet 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JakeH said:

A trio of obvious moves. Hill should be a relatively no-cost move and Alexander's career has literally gone up in smoke.  I'm interested in seeing the tender put on Remmers and if any other teams try to sign him to an offer sheet 

Remmers is an ERFA, other teams can't sign him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bartin said:

Don't know why we would bother with the tender for Hill. It's more expensive than the minimum and it's not like someone else is going to sign him.

Right. I think Gettleman will not tender Hill, making him a free agent and then the two sides will agree to 1 year base deal.

Works out for both parties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Expected to re-sign" per David Newton. It's kind of a throw-away line in the story about Josh's tag, doesn't say anything about Alexander at all either. Still, seem like obvious moves.

As for Remmers, looks like he got the necessary 6 games for an accrued season in 2013 when he bounced around from TB to SD to Min, so RFA should be right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jdpanther5 said:

"Expected to re-sign" per David Newton. It's kind of a throw-away line in the story about Josh's tag, doesn't say anything about Alexander at all either. Still, seem like obvious moves.

As for Remmers, looks like he got the necessary 6 games for an accrued season in 2013 when he bounced around from TB to SD to Min, so RFA should be right. 

yes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...