Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Panthers to re-sign WR Stephen Hill and T Mike Remmers


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

A trio of obvious moves. Hill should be a relatively no-cost move and Alexander's career has literally gone up in smoke.  I'm interested in seeing the tender put on Remmers and if any other teams try to sign him to an offer sheet 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JakeH said:

A trio of obvious moves. Hill should be a relatively no-cost move and Alexander's career has literally gone up in smoke.  I'm interested in seeing the tender put on Remmers and if any other teams try to sign him to an offer sheet 

Remmers is an ERFA, other teams can't sign him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bartin said:

Don't know why we would bother with the tender for Hill. It's more expensive than the minimum and it's not like someone else is going to sign him.

Right. I think Gettleman will not tender Hill, making him a free agent and then the two sides will agree to 1 year base deal.

Works out for both parties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Expected to re-sign" per David Newton. It's kind of a throw-away line in the story about Josh's tag, doesn't say anything about Alexander at all either. Still, seem like obvious moves.

As for Remmers, looks like he got the necessary 6 games for an accrued season in 2013 when he bounced around from TB to SD to Min, so RFA should be right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jdpanther5 said:

"Expected to re-sign" per David Newton. It's kind of a throw-away line in the story about Josh's tag, doesn't say anything about Alexander at all either. Still, seem like obvious moves.

As for Remmers, looks like he got the necessary 6 games for an accrued season in 2013 when he bounced around from TB to SD to Min, so RFA should be right. 

yes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How about just don't draft project players in the first round? How about especially when you have arguably the worst roster in the NFL(we did all those years in question)? You don't even have to dig into those player debates specifically. Just don't grasp at straws early in the draft.
    • I think there were 9, and since I haven't took time to watch each of them on each play individually Its impossible for me to say, which I doubt you have either.   It's not a stat driven grading system; it's a per play grading system.  Tommy Tremble making a great block to spring Rico for that 10-yard run might actually score higher on that play then Ricos run. The actual run might not be anything special; it might be a run that pretty much every back in the league would have made. Here again, I would guess, if you look at every RB in the league, he is towards the top in rushing grade for the year which is what most of us are seeing.  Whether you call that a 90/80/70, 50/40/30, A/B/C, Gold/Green/Red star, it doesn't really matter it's how he ranks relative to everybody else at his position.      
    • Well I will never knock a strong arm, in a vacuum, but it is a lot more than that to it.  Did we kill our roster building and our defense in particular to stick PJ out there?  No. We knew we sucked and he was really just a temporary thing too.  While with Bryce I see the up and down, mostly down, roller coaster on loop now in year three. It has been a Looooong time.    Back to strong arms, it is like having a powerful motor in a car. All the power in the world isn’t going to overcome a bad driver.   But at the same time, even a decent drive with a killer car will beat the best driver if you put him in a go kart   Exaggerating for effect, I know Bryce is not a go kart. Maybe closer to a 6 cylinder with not much displacement….. 
×
×
  • Create New...