Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Business is business with Gettleman


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Dave Gettleman has a heart, but he will still make the tough decisions: this is what I got from reading David Newton's article this morning and watching the video of Gettleman's interview with Bill Bill Polian (and others):

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcsouth/post/_/id/64192/panthers-gm-dave-gettleman-makes-the-tough-decisions-because-he-has-to

We all understand the Godfather references, but G-man absolutely hates this time of year because he knows that he must do what he 'has to' for the betterment of the entire organization. 

One "epiphany" that I had while watching the vid is that in regards to free agency, this relative quiet is probably how it is ALWAYS going to be under G-man's reign because he will never forsake homegrown talent in order to acquire a guy whose price has been inflated by the market (which is almost always the case for "splash" acquisitions). G-man will NEVER let the market rule him because it upsets the balance of the team culture (and ultimately its relation to the cap).

On an off note, Getty referenced the reality that players coming out of college are just not as fundamentally sound as they used to be. He noted that this wasn't an indictment on them or the college game, but just the way it is due to collegiate coaches' reliance on shemes. As such, this kind of plays into him saying that you hate to develop players for someone else and let them go, but you also get the feeling that he realizes that you can't keep them all, and that this is a good byproduct of doing a good job, and it's also why the draft is so important.

Gettleman takes a mature, big-picture approach. He has his fingers on the pulse of every aspect of the organization, and he is going to make the tough decisions for whatever he deems is the betterment of the team every single time, regardless of personal feelings.

"Rivera said Gettleman’s ability to separate his personal feelings from business in terms of making the tough decisions has 'been one of the things that’s helped us.'"

And so it has which is evidenced by the Panthers under Dave Gettleman's watch. Regardless of whether you like him or not, I think that understanding him goes a long way towards giving clarity and hopefully comfort in regards to the status and direction of the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really nice post @top dawg

Yes, while yesterday's interview with G'man may not have been too newsy (other than the no-brainer news re: Star's 5th year option), it really did give a window into Gettleman's heart and mind.  As you mentioned, he talked about how he HATES this time of year, that it's "like sticking a needle in your eye."

Polian laughed knowingly, and he also very clearly agreed with Gettleman's assessment of how long it's taking to develop college players since they increasingly lack fundamentals.

Gettleman essentially said "how can I sign these expensive free agents and then look the guys we drafted in the face and tell them there's no money to sign them?"

He'll do what he has to do for the good of the organization, not letting his feelings get in the way.  He recognizes he's going to have to make very very tough choices and will have to let some great guys "graduate" - i.e. leave for other teams.

Yet it's so clear he loves the players and is closely engaged with them.  A tender heart and yet a HARD head and no conmpromising when it comes to sticking with his plan.   Couldn't ask for a better combination, in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

David Newton has an article which gives more depth & detail about Gettleman's comments yesterday.  Good reading.

http://espn.go.com/blog/carolina-panthers/post/_/id/20200/panthers-gm-dave-gettleman-makes-the-tough-decisions-because-he-has-to

Here's the key excerpt which I found interesting:

Quote

 

Rivera believes the decisions will become harder for Gettleman the longer he’s around and is faced with cutting high-profile players he brought to the organization.

“It might change him," Rivera said. “Dave is very loyal. He develops relationships. He’s a different type of general manager. He’s involved with the players a little bit more. He’s available for the players a little bit more."

While he might agonize more over such matters, Gettleman vowed he won’t change.

He said he wrestled with the choice to release defensive end Charles Johnson, second on the team’s all-time sacks list, to clear $11 million under the salary cap after this past season. Gettleman still made the move.

He also re-signed Johnson to a bargain-basement, one-year, $3 million deal a week later.

Gettleman said the relationship he had with Johnson allowed that to happen. He didn’t have that same bond with Smith or Williams.

“We could talk to each other," Gettleman said. “I went to his grandmother’s funeral [in Georgia]. Ron and I drove down. It was the Saturday after the Seattle game in the ’14 season. I think it meant a lot to him.

“He and I have established a good relationship. [Cutting him] was hard for me, but I had to do it.’’

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, top dawg said:

this relative quiet is probably how it is ALWAYS going to be under G-man's reign because he will never forsake homegrown talent in order to acquire a guy whose price has been inflated by the market (which is almost always the case for "splash" acquisitions). G-man will NEVER let the market rule him because it upsets the balance of the team culture (and ultimately its relation to the cap).

Let's hope it'll still be done that way after Gman has retired, since it's the best way to operate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, KB_fan said:

Really nice post @top dawg

Yes, while yesterday's interview with G'man may not have been too newsy (other than the no-brainer news re: Star's 5th year option), it really did give a window into Gettleman's heart and mind.  As you mentioned, he talked about how he HATES this time of year, that it's "like sticking a needle in your eye."

Polian laughed knowingly, and he also very clearly agreed with Gettleman's assessment of how long it's taking to develop college players since they increasingly lack fundamentals.

Gettleman essentially said "how can I sign these expensive free agents and then look the guys we drafted in the face and tell them there's no money to sign them?"

He'll do what he has to do for the good of the organization, not letting his feelings get in the way.  He recognizes he's going to have to make very very tough choices and will have to let some great guys "graduate" - i.e. leave for other teams.

Yet it's so clear he loves the players and is closely engaged with them.  A tender heart and yet a HARD head and no conmpromising when it comes to sticking with his plan.   Couldn't ask for a better combination, in my opinion.

Very well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Translation: we finally have a GM that can run the most basic of NPV calculations instead of blindly throwing darts at a board.

 

I swear, organized sports have to be last vestige of cronyism/nepotism that existed in big business.  Could you imagine what would happen to a product-line VP at Visa if he approved a six-year, $72MM co-brand agreement with Cabo Fish Taco because a friend owns it?  Sports GMs do this kinda crap all the time and get away with it regardless of team performance because of their built-in network of protection.  GMan finally doing things right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of the NFL will one day catch on to this man's agenda. Be frugal in FA and don't be tempted by the big name. Find the pieces to add depth or a lower tier FA with some skill to fill a starting spot. Save the $ for home grown talent and kill it in the draft. Being able to retain our own talent while adding valuable young talent is a formula for sustained success.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Dick the Butcher said:

Translation: we finally have a GM that can run the most basic of NPV calculations instead of blindly throwing darts at a board.

 

I swear, organized sports have to be last vestige of cronyism/nepotism that existed in big business.  Could you imagine what would happen to a product-line VP at Visa if he approved a six-year, $72MM co-brand agreement with Cabo Fish Taco because a friend owns it?  Sports GMs do this kinda crap all the time and get away with it regardless of team performance because of their built-in network of protection.  GMan finally doing things right.

Not to get off topic, but corporations still do that all the time. It works out about as well as it does in the NFL usually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...