Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"Strong interest" in LB Josh Forrest


top dawg

Recommended Posts

I guess "scary interest" trumps "strong interest", but I couldn't resist starting this thread. Seriously though, whatever the interest in Josh Forrest and Su'a Cravens, it has to mean something. Forrest had a very good senior year at Kentucky, and CBS Sports ranked him the 12th best LB according to Cincy Jungle. He was listed as an LB/SS at UK according to research.  That being said, he needs a lot of work (in the weight room and on the fundamentals), but still projects as early as a 3rd/4th rounder by some analysts. If he lasts until day three, I can see Getty making a move.

People suspect that clubs will view Forrest as an edge rushing WLB, although Lance Zierlein thinks he is a better "straight-line" blitzer. With talk of Forrest, wouldn't a drafting of both Cravens and Forrest perhaps mean that Getty really does see Cravens as a safety? Moreover, some people are already thinking that Shaq and Su'a are similar players, so what does that make Forrest, the poor man's version of either?

I wouldn't be surprised if we don't find Forrest on the Panthers if we draft Cravens or not, given Getty's apparent love for athletic linebackers and unbreakable steadfastness to drafting the BPA on his board (apparently irrespective of perceived strength at a position).

I think it would be interesting to see us acquire both, because I believe both would actually add to the defense. The presumption is that Cravens would contribute immediately, but, make no mistake, Forrest has plenty of upside and would definitely be a nice pick in the later rounds. What this would mean for our entire group of libebackers going forward, I don't know.

http://www.hngn.com/articles/191810/20160323/bengals-panthers-showing-strong-interest-in-kentucky-josh-forrest-rumors.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

Our LB depth is pretty crap. After Klein we only have Jacobs, who is a special teamer only, and Mayo, who also seems like a special teamer only.

I assume that both Jacobs and Mayo are solid depth (as far as depth goes). Mayo in particular seems like the kind of player who could presumably be a starter in a couple of years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I assume that both Jacobs and Mayo are solid depth (as far as depth goes). Mayo in particular seems like the kind of player who could presumably be a starter in a couple of years. 

I think of depth as someone that can play the position their assigned to well and not only a special teamer.  If he's special teams only, I don't count it as depth. Jacobs is terrible as a LB. Mayo is still learning but he has a steep mountain to climb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Promethean Forerunner said:

I wouldn't be shocked. We heard murmurs about Shaq but we dismissed them because he was an undersized hybrid. Rivera is still seeking his safety. I wouldn't be surprised if we took him in the first or if we traded up in the second for him.

I wouldn't mind this. TD isn't getting younger and Shaq will replace him. So we will need another starting LB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am gonna believe it wasn’t us if the 4th round pick price is accurate. We needed 225 points to get from 19 to their pick. 875 at 19 to 1100 at 14.  Our 2026 4th was valued at 56 points I think. A future 4th has less value. So that wasn’t close to enough.    It would have taken our third and our fourth. Comes within a point of even.    Now, moving to their spot in the second round we could have done but after Miami took Rodriguez why would we? 
    • Yep,and Blake Miller have had more experiences than Freeling,Lions did not sigh a vet T like Walker,so they had to pick Miller.
    • I mean it's expected.  This is the NBA.  And they hate the Charlotte Hornets.  Flagg was also the guy "magically" given to the Mavs who lost Luca to the wildly popular Lakers.  Was always an uphill battle.  But the award is BS since it's not voted on before play-in starts. Kon probably lost because of the play-in as many people switched votes.  It was a regular season award, so this is some nonsense.  Kon also didn't have the luxury of taking 10 games off to rest up injuries like Flagg did.  If he did, he wouldn't have been nursing his back the last month.  I mean, screw him for being on an actual playoff team that matters.  Flagg took tons of shots a game, he was wildly inefficient.  Kon was a huge reason the Hornets made the play-in and turned the season around after Jan.   I think Flagg will probably be the better player long term, or at least the most impact.  But Kon should have won ROTY.
×
×
  • Create New...