Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Josh's response to the AP


LUUUUUKE

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, mjligon said:

The ball is in Josh's court.

The ball has been in his court the entire time, until today. He could have signed on with the Panthers before and during any period of the negotiations. The ball is no longer in his court according to this franchise. A precedent was just set.

When was the last time you heard of a team rescinding a franchise offer? I can't remember. That's a very significant move, wouldn't you agree?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We were offering 12 million a year. I have no sympathy for him. Loved as a Panther but in one year he would make more money than any of us in a lifetime. In 4 years he would be able to retire at 33, have millions in the bank, probably won a SB and be set for life. No he wanted to play hardball. If you want QB money then be a QB. See ya

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, KendrickPanther said:

Anyone holding out hope of Josh coming back is delusional. Someone will pay him and he will have too much pride to take less to stay. Things obviously got so nasty the Panthers didn't even want him under the tag for a year.

I don't understand why people are assuming things got nasty.  There was nothing made public of any untoward actions by either party.  Does it not make entirely more sense that he's doing the same thing he did with CJ?  I mean the pattern has already been shown to us just a few weeks ago.  Gettleman takes a risk by letting player go.  Player tests the market, then either decides to come back at a rate Gettleman can live with or doesn't.  Doesn't have to be anything nasty about it at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was a big supporter of Josh, but he have done what many other players have done, he forgot where he came from. Yes, he deserves more money, but not the type of money he is seeking. What I don't understand is his so called agent. His main goal is to make his client more profitable and known to generate more revenue. One way of doing this is to be on a winning team to generate a profitable market, which increases endorsements. Josh is on a high pedestal right now, but his agent isn't helping his market value by making his Client seem like a problem, and could cause him to be signed by a less attractive team, which could make Josh popularity diminish. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And for the record, I'm not holding out hope he comes back.  I'm 95% sure he doesn't.  Some other team will almost certainly give him much more money than we can afford.  But it's not due to ill will or anything like that.  We just can't afford what some other teams can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JawnyBlaze said:

I don't understand why people are assuming things got nasty.  There was nothing made public of any untoward actions by either party.  Does it not make entirely more sense that he's doing the same thing he did with CJ?  I mean the pattern has already been shown to us just a few weeks ago.  Gettleman takes a risk by letting player go.  Player tests the market, then either decides to come back at a rate Gettleman can live with or doesn't.  Doesn't have to be anything nasty about it at all.

CJ is not comparable at all. Josh is coming off an All Pro season. His value on the open market will never be higher than it is right now. CJ is just looking to hold on for a few more seasons and chose familiarity over a few extra bucks. We could have kept him under the tag. We let him walk because threats were being made about missing camp and not going full speed. This is bigger than just bargaining tactics. You don't put all pros on the open market to lower their value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, KendrickPanther said:

CJ is not comparable at all. Josh is coming off an All Pro season. His value on the open market will never be higher than it is right now. CJ is just looking to hold on for a few more seasons and chose familiarity over a few extra bucks. We could have kept him under the tag. We let him walk because threats were being made about missing camp and not going full speed. This is bigger than just bargaining tactics. You don't put all pros on the open market to lower their value.

What the did the season prior has no bearing on it.  If anything, that's why Josh got the franchise tag in the first place and CJ didn't.  There were no threats (just questions answered.  He did just go and work out with Cam, after all.  He wasn't threatening anything) and he certainly never said he wasn't gonna go full speed.  That's not even remotely within his character.  This also wasn't about lowering his value on Gettleman's part.  This was either A) just to put a legit number on his value since the negotiations had stalemated because the two sides differed in opinion on his value, or B) Gettleman really saw the negotiations as a lost cause and no sense in tying up $14mil of the cap if there's no chance of a long term deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you are an athlete or former athlete (myself?  Cornhole 2021-present; Disc Golf 2013-got a mega blister and had to retire; speed walking--every black Friday at Walmart 2003-2009) you know what it is to lose confidence.  Self-inflicted or not (in my view, a lot of 2023 was coaching and a lot of 2024 was confidence), he has confidence now. How fragile is it?  I think the light is on, the game slowed down, and he is ready to do his thing.  He seems to be "mobile in the pocket" instead of "running scared."   Last year, there were times when AT was out, Johnson gone, and all he really had was XL and Coker--a raw rookie with upside and an UDFA rookie.  TE was rarely a viable option. It reminded me of Benjamin and Funchess.   Moore had to step up.  This season, Bryce has weapons.  I expect XL to improve.  I expect TMac to help tremendously, and I think Coker will be solid.  Renfrow?  Horn?  bonuses.    
    • His points are valid.  However, it seems a bit based on past performance and fails to take into consideration trends and conditions that might suggest growth in 2025.   For one, he breaks the team down by position and ranks them separately.  I guess that is a fair way to do it, but they are dependent upon each other. Last year, our DL sucked.  That impacts the rest of the defense.  With no internal pressure, the QBs simply step up to avoid the Edge rush.  I would have suggested that the internal DL is now featuring pass rushers and large people who can collapse the pocket.  Secondly, the LBs were not protected very well in 2024.  It is hard to see the holes and step up when a guard is in your earhole a second after the snap.  Finally, the defensive backs will be forced to make fewer tackles and they will be better in pass protection with a new and improved DL.    Canales made an interesting comment the other day, and I (from the outside looking in) feel the same way:  (paraphrasing) "I have never seen a better group of rookies."   I think the biggest concern is the learning curve.  How long before these rookies are ready?   I am bullish on this team.  I think they win 3 of their first 4 and get confident.  The get the fans behind them.  From there, they win 6 of the remaining 13.  If they stay injury free, they have an outside shot at the NFC south.     
    • Biiiiiig eyeroll on this.  First, Look at historical stats of the most recent historical great DBs.  I plucked 3, Revis, Sherman, and Norman (cuzz he was our guy).  Combined post age 30, there are TWO pro bowls between those 3 and wanna get this...ZERO seasons with 16 games started.  ALL missed time.  It is RARE that Corners survive that long in the NFL and its about time we started recognizing this fact.  Jaycee is a good bet because it hasnt been anything seriously devastating injury wise, and with his sample size he could and should be an incredible piece for the panthers through age 30. Jaire kinda flops on the other side, hes 28...so hes under 30, but he wants his payday before it comes up, hes also been injury prone lately.  Bulk of the contract will be on opposite side of 30.  Will both of these guys help us be better in 2026?  SURE!  No doubt, but the question is, will these guys help us past 2026...not sure. The investment isnt worth the risk, nor would the ROI be anywhere close to worth it.  Neither guy is moving us from a 6-8 win team to a 8-10 team, period. My point is we're in this state a 6-8 win team IMO and he projects us as  a 4-6 win team.  EVEN if we think Jaire or Ramsey will make us a 6-8 win team, it in NO WAY is worth the money or capital to move that much just to suck kinda less.  
×
×
  • Create New...