Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Miller of Bleacher Report: "I give the pick a B, they have other needs but I've realized not to go against G-Man."

nctarheel0619

By nctarheel0619,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

PantherBoy95 Experienced

PantherBoy95

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, The Lobo said:

Hate it when ppl grade based on need. Shows they have no idea what they are talking about. You grade on the player you got that's it. 

I wouldn't say that. Hypothetically if we have Cam Newton, and get another QB in the first who is BPA. But we have a huge hole at CB and there is a very good CB on the board.

Would you consider that an A?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tiger7_88 Experienced

tiger7_88

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, PantherBoy95 said:

I wouldn't say that. Hypothetically if we have Cam Newton, and get another QB in the first who is BPA. But we have a huge hole at CB and there is a very good CB on the board.

Would you consider that an A?

I really think most GM's don't add QBs into the BPA equation.

You either need a QB... or you don't.

If you have one, you don't need one.  At other positions you can have adequate starters but you will always need depth at those positions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherBoy95 Experienced

PantherBoy95

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, tiger7_88 said:

I really think most GM's don't add QBs into the BPA equation.

You either need a QB... or you don't.

If you have one, you don't need one.  At other positions you can have adequate starters but you will always need depth at those positions.

True, I was trying to greatly exaggerate to make the point. I do think grades should be PARTIALLY based on need. If you have good depth at RB and BPA is RB, but you have a Byron Bell at LT and a good LT is out there I think you take the LT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OldhamA
      Panthers Blueprint: Draft

      By OldhamA · Posted

      I'd hold on to Walker - we have no OT depth at all. Freeling is a block of clay - all the tools are there and he appears to have a great attitude. He needs serious work on his technique to realise his potential though.
    • OldhamA
      Panthers Blueprint: Draft

      By OldhamA · Posted

      From my watch last night: They weren't trading out of 19 unless it was a daft offer once Freeling got there. They were clearly antsy to get Hunter - and Minnesota actually called to offer the trade down. They weren't trading out of the third round pick once Brazzell fell to it (and Canales would have been happy with him in the second round). They traded back a lot on Day 3 - even if Morgan 'Babe Ruth'd' it with Lee, Hecht and Wheatley; they clearly weren't the only guys they would have taken at those picks. I'm curious to know which player caused the reaction at the start of day 2 (Dan Morgan): "of course they'd pick him"
    • CmC2k
      Panthers Blueprint: Draft

      By CmC2k · Posted

      Watching this confirms that this staff and front office is super high on Monroe Freeling. I wouldn't be surprised if he's gotta a real chance to win the starting LT job in camp. If he does, we can look to flip Rasheed Walker to a contender desperate for tackle help.   As for Ickey I still really like him and wanna extend him but based on how the staff was talking about Freeling it might be time for ickey to start taking some practice sets at guard if he wants to stay here as we are gonna have to have figure out a solution for the contracts of Lewis and Hunt.  My preferred scenario for the Oline in 2027 is Freeling-Ickey-Hech-Lewis-Moton. 
×
×
  • Create New...