Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2016 NFL DRAFT ROUND 4 GENERAL DISCUSSION


NcPsa10

Recommended Posts

So, we ignore offensive line depth and running back depth (a place where a good portion of our injuries occur). We add 3 cornerbacks to the roster. Bradberry looking like a huge reach. Worley was a good pick. Then we add Sanchez who apparently got burnt quite a bit in college. We added a DT (not hating it after time). Tell me again what killed us in the SB? Stewart going down and our offensive line having no answer for Miller at all. I usually am 100 percent behind Gettleman and I still trust him but this draft is a huge gamble. If it does not pay off it may actually set us back some. Here's to hoping offensive line and our running back stay healthy. Also, hoping our tight end stays healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OldNorthPowell said:

So, we ignore offensive line depth and running back depth (a place where a good portion of our injuries occur). We add 3 cornerbacks to the roster. Bradberry looking like a huge reach. Worley was a good pick. Then we add Sanchez who apparently got burnt quite a bit in college. We added a DT (not hating it after time). Tell me again what killed us in the SB? Stewart going down and our offensive line having no answer for Miller at all. I usually am 100 percent behind Gettleman and I still trust him but this draft is a huge gamble. If it does not pay off it may actually set us back some. Here's to hoping offensive line and our running back stay healthy. Also, hoping our tight end stays healthy.

Sanchez only got burnt when he had to flip his hips and run with the bigger, faster receivers. That won't happen here. Rivera wants the CBs to face the ball and attack 80% of the time. And when you have ball skills like Sanchez has, he is a great fit for a zone scheme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, XClown1986 said:

Sanchez only got burnt when he had to flip his hips and run with the bigger, faster receivers. That won't happen here. Rivera wants the CBs to face the ball and attack 80% of the time. And when you have ball skills like Sanchez has, he is a great fit for a zone scheme.

Again let us hope you are right. Also, ignoring offensive depth could easily turn into a big mistake. We could of signed cornerbacks left in free agency not much talented depth left at O-Line, RB, or TE. We even tried to sign a TE knowing it was a need to have a better back up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OldNorthPowell said:

Again let us hope you are right. Also, ignoring offensive depth could easily turn into a big mistake. We could of signed cornerbacks left in free agency not much talented depth left at O-Line, RB, or TE. We even tried to sign a TE knowing it was a need to have a better back up.

I don't think I can look at it as ignoring other positions so much as finding value and fits too good to pass up. Gettleman wouldn't draft 3 corners in a row out of panic. One? Sure. But not 3. He saw value and potential for the defense we run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OldNorthPowell said:

Again let us hope you are right. Also, ignoring offensive depth could easily turn into a big mistake. We could of signed cornerbacks left in free agency not much talented depth left at O-Line, RB, or TE. We even tried to sign a TE knowing it was a need to have a better back up.

Anyone who question GM is an idiot lol I agree I would have liked a pick for backup OL or TE. Also Oher contract is up we might have to look for another LT soon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, XClown1986 said:

I don't think I can look at it as ignoring other positions so much as finding value and fits too good to pass up. Gettleman wouldn't draft 3 corners in a row out of panic. One? Sure. But not 3. He saw value and potential for the defense we run.

We can agree to disagree. Depth on the offensive side is a huge need at multiple positions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...