Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Happy 27th Birthday Cam!!!: A look into Panthers Super Bowl window...


firefox1234

Recommended Posts

What a great day it is that our franchise QB is celebrating his 27th birthday or is it....it kinda dawned on me that Cam is getting older(I know like wtf, how could I not see that coming!) So here's my question what is the Panthers Super Bowl window looking like and how will that affect personel or play calling in the future years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel pretty confident that by the time he stops running, his mental and pocket passing will keep him at the top. I can't wait to see his stats this year. Remember last season, he said he wanted to complete over 65% of his passes but only finished at 59.8%. After the bye week he was at 61.2% and for the final 8 weeks he was 65.9%. With KB being back and an experienced Funchess, I feel he can hit 65% for the season in 2016.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Malt Liquor said:

Right now there is a 8 year window. Cam will be 35 by then. If we can win 4 superbowls out of those 8 years l would be ecstatic. I think my prediction is very possible.

To be honest if we win one in that time span I would be content seeing how even the best players are lucky to even achieve that....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1989 was a great year. The year produced some greats. I'm 27 myself, can't believe I'm older than dude haha. 

Happy Birthday Cam! As for a window; I believe Cam will still be able to run well for another 3-4 years. After that, there's no reason to believe he won't be able to carry us with his passing. He's done it so much already, and he'll continue to get better. As long as Cam is playing, we'll be a threat and in contention

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Kakarot said:

1989 was a great year. The year produced some greats. I'm 27 myself, can't believe I'm older than dude haha. 

Happy Birthday Cam! As for a window; I believe Cam will still be able to run well for another 3-4 years. After that, there's no reason to believe he won't be able to carry us with his passing. He's done it so much already, and he'll continue to get better. As long as Cam is playing, we'll be a threat and in contention

Happy Birthday, Cam!!!

You're right, Kakarot that 1989 was a great year. I'll be 27 next month.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, if Moore really wants out, then it would behoove the Bears to make it happen sooner than later. X is a lot younger and cheaper, and may be a better fit for Johnson's musings than a disgruntled, unnecessary, overpaid vet. If they can dump his salary and maybe get a fourth or so in return, it may be worth it to them. As for development, I'm not concerned. You're talking about a seeming bust, a day three guy and a UDFA. They are developing relative to their ceilings. I doubt any of them will ever command the coverage, money, or the respect that Moore has acquired. He's a tier above them. Yes, even X. 
    • IMO, if Ceedee plays against us, the game probably goes the other way. Same with Tyreek Hill and the Dolphins. Our team just isn't designed to beat teams with two high level receivers like that. But when you look at the league, how many teams really have two guys of that caliber?  There's nothing wrong with defensive adjustments, but sometimes I think a lot of fans want Evero to call a different play like a game on madden, and defensive football just isn't like that. That said, I thought we did a much better job this season against the Cowboys of flipping Jaycee and at least making them work for it, opposed to last season when they literally just lined CeeDee up on the other side of the field every single snap.  For us to just straight up switch to consistent man coverage, or a different zone, or whatever, we likely would consistently need different personnel on the field. Doing it a few times a game is a gamble and can work, but if we consistently run man coverage against the Cowboys, eventually a RB is going to beat a linebacker, or something of that nature with our personnel. Part of the reason Evero likes this scheme is that, while we have our defaults and presets, what we do is very multiple, and you can do a lot of different things pre and post snap. We are a challenging defense to read. But as you said, if guys are getting beat, it doesn't really matter what you call. 
×
×
  • Create New...