Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Surprise, surprise. Rams have to cancel 'Rams Legends' game due to poor ticket sales.


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

So this is a bit awkward.

I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but if you were planning on seeing the best Rams players of past and present suiting up against a team of NFL All-Stars at the Rams Legends game on Aug. 14, well, keep an eye out for that refund. Because it gone.

The Legends Game, which was ostensibly scheduled to pump up fans and symbolize a return to form for the returning franchise, has been called off due to poor ticket sales, per the St. Louis Post-Dispatch's Jim Thomas.

The game was originally slated to kick off at the StubHub Center in Carson, California, and included Rams greats Kurt Warner, Marshall Faulk, Torry Holt and others.

This, of course, stands in contrast from the Rams' St. Louis leg of the Legends series. That game, hosted back in the Edward Jones Dome, drew out more than 10,000 fans in July.

Now, Rams fans will have to content themselves with Saturday's training camp scrimmage at the Los Angeles Coliseum — an event that could draw as many as 80,000 fans. Maybe.

http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/rams-cancel-rams-legends-game-due-to-poor-ticket-sales-080216

Their owner will be begging to get out of that football poo hole in LA in about 10-15 years.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, cookinwithgas said:

I really don't get it. San Diego has a team with the same coastline and weather. San Fran does well. What is it with LA? Do they think they are too hip for football?

They're given hand-me-downs of shitty teams. I think that's the main reason. They've never been allowed to birth a team that they could really call theirs. No team that has played there has been first and foremost a "Los Angeles" team, born and raised there.

If the Jaguars tomorrow announced they were moving to a stadium next to my house to be the Rodeo's House Jaguars, I'd shrug and keep rooting for the Panthers. Because I couldn't care less about the Jaguars no matter where they play.

But if a team was awarded to here, was formed here, created here, named here, I would be far more likely to support them.

Nobody gives a crap about the Rams no matter where they play. If they want LA to support a team, they have to create an LA team, not transplant one of the worst teams nobody cares about and expect them to suddenly become a big success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poor ticket sales has nothing to do with the "team" as it is with the lack of marketing.

How many people in Los Angeles knew about this Legends game? I've heard of the game once and i get daily/weekly emails from the Rams for being a Season Ticket holder. Poor planning and execution from their marketing team. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, thebigcat said:

So you're telling me that L.A fans are flaky... Who would have thought

LA needs to pay a few stars to show up at games in Rams gear, then everyone would flock to the games. It worked for the Lakers.

 

edit: Plus their best player is coaching our receivers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, nctarheel0619 said:

The Legends Game, which was ostensibly scheduled to pump up fans and symbolize a return to form for the returning franchise, has been called off due to poor ticket sales, per the St. Louis Post-Dispatch's Jim Thomas.

The game was originally slated to kick off at the StubHub Center in Carson, California, and included Rams greats Kurt Warner, Marshall Faulk, Torry Holt and others.

1) Should have been free like our Fan Fest. Make an investment in drumming up interest

2) Kurt Warner, Marshall Faulk, or Torry Holt never played for the LA team, so...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rodeo said:

They're given hand-me-downs of shitty teams. I think that's the main reason. They've never been allowed to birth a team that they could really call theirs. No team that has played there has been first and foremost a "Los Angeles" team, born and raised there.

If the Jaguars tomorrow announced they were moving to a stadium next to my house to be the Rodeo's House Jaguars, I'd shrug and keep rooting for the Panthers. Because I couldn't care less about the Jaguars no matter where they play.

But if a team was awarded to here, was formed here, created here, named here, I would be far more likely to support them.

Nobody gives a crap about the Rams no matter where they play. If they want LA to support a team, they have to create an LA team, not transplant one of the worst teams nobody cares about and expect them to suddenly become a big success.

It also doesn't help that LA is a very transient city, nobody in LA is actually from LA and they come to town with a rooting interest in another team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This doesn't surprise me, the team has been gone for 22 years and guys like Faulk, Holt and Warner never played a down for an LA team so why would the fans want to pay to see a flag football game with a bunch of "legends" that were on the team when they played in another city? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...