Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Madden Team Ratings revealed


TN05

Recommended Posts

Panthers team ratings:
Overall - 87 (tied for first with New England)
Offense - 91 (second in the league behind the 93-rated Pittsburgh Steelers)
Defense -  87 (tied for fifth with the Bengals and Vikings; behind only Seattle, New England, Denver, and Kansas City)

No overall Special Teams ratings have been revealed, but I assume that's where we get pulled down - 87 overall seems a bit low just looking at offense/defense ratings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Salisburysean98 said:

Panthers should be top 3 at least. Hard to see KC and Seattle ahead of us.

I can see it, EA Sports had to ding us pretty good in our secondary.  No reason for them to think much of ours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, RickyManningJr said:

I wonder how Bradberry and Worley look stats wise. Could be decent because they are big if they hook them up with some speed.

Probably very low. Vernon Butler is only a 74 and I can't imagine they would be higher. We're probably saved by the rest of the defense though - Kuechly is a 99 (maybe the first Panther ever to get one), Short is a 92, Davis an 89, and Coleman is a 87.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stars rating is probably the most off of anyone, but brockers for the rams has the same rating and plays a similar role.

Bradberry may be solid, 90speed, 81 zone, 77 hit power. Worly has high 80s press. 

Our defense has some insane catch ratings(81 luke, 80 coleman, i remember shaq davis and a fe others are good too) and luke got a nice hit power bump up to 93. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Can't keep pining for what never happened....but for god sakes, DeJean, Frazier... and we got this dude in a R1 trade up.  The most notable blunder of this era, that's for sure. 
    • Overall, fine.  Wish we landed a guy to pair with Lloyd but I presume this means they're giving Trevin one final year to put it together (72nd overall 2 years back).  Flashed potential year 1, had a dud last year.   R1: Freeling LT - Great value and a need; landed our new long term LT that could end up starting off the bat.  Icky had a terrible injury and is not playing in his contract year.  Walker is what he is on a 1-year rental, who even knows how he fits. You get premier OTs early if you can find em' and he has what you want.  I thought he could have gone as high as 6/CLE pre-draft, so am a big fan of the selection.  Looking at this class, he's one of the guys at the top that is like "okay that's the LT".  Others have this right/left or G/T type discussion about them.  Freeling is an LT.   R2: Hunter NT - We didn't really have anyone replacing A'Shawn's snaps in our rotation.  Wharton & Brown aren't 3 downers so adding Hunter to the mix fills a big void. I dug deep into S and LB this draft so was a bit to zeroed in - In recognize the value and impact add in the trenches. R3: Brazzell WR - Intriguing.  Given our history, I don't really want to place any expectations here, but a different style weapon for Bryce. I pretty much expect a WR drafted yearly with this regime. Other notables.. Hecht C - These are the type of rounds where starting centers have been found.  We got a starter for this year, but Hecht seems pretty capable and I like it for a long term find.  SOLID AF.  Wheatley S - A pretty well regarded safety prospect.  And we see it every year (like this one) safeties get hyped, people think they may go sooner than expected, and the league reminds them how it rolls.  Plenty of nice safeties have been found in the 4th-6th in recent years.  Big fan of Wheatley. Can't say I know enough about Lee or the others. 
×
×
  • Create New...