Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So I'm officially directing and producing a feature-length Vietnam War film


PhillyB

Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

? no one's wearing those, they're all vietnam-era M1 helmets with mitchell pattern covers

It looks like there is a mix, but I suppose it could be how they're wearing it. The first black and white picture looks like a few PASGTs mixed in, but the next black and white picture (from behind) looks otherwise.

If not, I apologize. False alarm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Chimera said:

It looks like there is a mix, but I suppose it could be how they're wearing it. The first black and white picture looks like a few PASGTs mixed in, but the next black and white picture (from behind) looks otherwise.

If not, I apologize. False alarm.

the only anachronism in the gear loadouts is anyone with a backpack. original P64 frames and jungle rucksacks are a good $500/set, so i'm having to take ALICE packs and rig them up on frames to look as similar as possible to the originals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, El Dandy said:

I second the guy who said you should tone down the rhetoric. Bashing on Stanley Kubrick, Oliver Stone, and Francis Ford Coppola isn't going to win you over any fans. Pretty much every Vietnam movie ever has pointed out how bad and morally ambiguous it was too.

Although my personal involvement was on the periphery, toward the end of the war the rhetoric had given way to the stories and lives of the individuals. Guys cared about each other and the common goal was to make sure the short-timers got home. The name of the game was survival and everyone leaned on each other for that support. "Hurt Locker" and "Jarhead," while of a different era, captured some of the personal struggles rather than deal almost exclusively with the politics.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Anybodyhome said:

i'm about 80% done with gear acquisitions, but the other 20% will go to rounding out the authenticity factor. i've got field-worn buttpacks coming in, vintage canteen holders, etc.

i'll also be getting everything properly faded and filthy prior to shooting principle photography on the film. this is just a teaser. also worth noting this particular sequence is set about three hours into a mission, after a week or so on base with plenty of time to wash clothes, so while gear will be worn and weapons will be scratched up, guys won't need to be dirty per se.

it'll all come together in time for the film.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, El Dandy said:

I second the guy who said you should tone down the rhetoric. Bashing on Stanley Kubrick, Oliver Stone, and Francis Ford Coppola isn't going to win you over any fans. Pretty much every Vietnam movie ever has pointed out how bad and morally ambiguous it was too.

i'm not bashing them. this is a common strategy for niche-market independent films trying to carve out a space in an existing pantheon of period films. it also helps with fundraising.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you can write in any extended sex scenes with Ninjas... then I am your guy. 

Think about it..the "War is Hell" theme is overplayed in most 'Nam movies.

What would stand out is a movie that explores the plight of war AND has a Ninja sex scene in it!!  It is truly the story that needs to be told. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just launched the teaser trailer! i shot and cut the entire thing myself, which is pretty much proof positive we need to get the budget to come through for a pro DP and production team, haha. still it's the best visual we've got so far.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would heavily push back on the notion of Tomlin and Cowher inheriting "collapsed teams." From 1980 to 1991(prior to Cowher and after their Super Bowl victories) the Steelers experienced just 4 sub .500 seasons. In fact the winning percentage for those years was 0.505. At most that was relatively mediocre, something fairly akin to the pre-Tepper Panthers. From Cowher through Tomlin(1992 to Present) it has been the NFL's best franchise. 22 playoff appearances, 4 Super Bowl Appearances, 2 Titles, 15 times winning the division. In fact they have only experienced 3 sub .500 records in that 34 season span.  That isn't ever a scenario where rebuilding happens. It's constant and consistent retooling so that your franchise floor is always high. It's smart business decisions, exceptional drafting and quality personnel moves that create a situation where that floor STAYS high.  It was precisely BECAUSE we opted to go through a complete teardown and "rebuild" without any of that competence being in the organization at all that led us to where we are currently. A situation that will more than likely continue for well over a decade longer.  Long term successful franchises do not "rebuild." They are in a constant state of competent flux that sustains them through some leaner periods without ripping the foundation completely out that led to that success in the first place. 
    • Houston's OL sucks but Stroud has also definitely regressed. Similar story to Jayden Daniels in Washington. Both guys looked like future MVPs as rookies but sustaining success in the NFL at QB is hard. The more tape there is on you for opposing DCs to study the harder it gets.
    • So I was curious and remember seeing a tweet but here are Young’s numbers vs Strouds number since that time  Stroud since week 3 2025. Bryce since coming back off the bench and playing in Denver 
×
×
  • Create New...