Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Newsday: Panthers to work out Will Beatty


jdpanther5

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, electro's horse said:

Eh. He blew out a pec benching, then tore his rotator cuff rehabbing it. 

As long as his pec is fine he should be okay. 

Bigger problem is his conditioning at this point. He'll have been basically out of football for nearly 2 years. 

So has Foucault,  in a sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Joe Person ‏@josephperson

Former Giants offensive tackle Will Beatty had his workout w/ Panthers. But no contract offer at this point, per league sources.

Let the overreaction begin.

See, this is the kind of thing that bothers me. Calling it an overreaction if people are upset about allowing a player to leave town without a contract. It's an easy position to take because you'll never be wrong for advocating doing nothing except what the front office actually does. Don't be so smug. If people want to react, let them react without feeling like that makes them lemmings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Vagrant said:

In fact, one of the bigger surprises for me was the fact that we didn't do something addressing the RT position after what it did to us in the Super Bowl. 

What surprised me was Rivera saying Williams was not pushing Remmers for the starting job. I hope that is more of Williams not being there yet than Rivera sticking with his guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Vagrant said:

The starters are pretty secure? Mike Remmers is the definition of serviceable on the right side and Michael Oher, as admirable as he played last year, was on the scrap heap before that. That takes nothing away from what he did last year, but if he returns to a pumpkin our entire line is screwed. I have no idea what the organization continually sees in Foucault but he's on roller skates against most defensive ends. Our interior line is so elite that it does a lot to help our outside guys, but let's not pretend like we don't have a tackle problem. We very much do. 

Yes, the starters are secure. They are looking for depth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Vagrant said:

See, this is the kind of thing that bothers me. Calling it an overreaction if people are upset about allowing a player to leave town without a contract. It's an easy position to take because you'll never be wrong for advocating doing nothing except what the front office actually does. Don't be so smug. If people want to react, let them react without feeling like that makes them lemmings.

I would advise not letting what anyone else on this or any other board says make you "feel" anything about your own opinion. You'll save a lot of stress that way. :)

A lot of times fans want "something" done and react or overreact accordingly. Often times with DG doing nothing is his best move but fans usually are upset "something" wasn't done. It happens on this board year after year. And I think that's what Mr Scot was alluding to. Don't let it bother you brother. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Moorgan said:

I would advise not letting what anyone else on this or any other board says make you "feel" anything about your own opinion. You'll save a lot of stress that way. :)

A lot of times fans want "something" done and react or overreact accordingly. Often times with DG doing nothing is his best move but fans usually are upset "something" wasn't done. It happens on this board year after year. And I think that's what Mr Scot was alluding to. Don't let it bother you brother. :)

Pretty much.

How many pages of angst were posted over the non-signing of Greg Jennings? And before that, Hakeem Nicks (oy)?

More than once, someone "leaving without a contract" led to wailing and gnashing of teeth as well.

Now I will say that reaction to this has been muted so far, so that's a plus.

If Beatty signs somewhere else though, all bets are off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Vagrant said:

See, this is the kind of thing that bothers me. Calling it an overreaction if people are upset about allowing a player to leave town without a contract. It's an easy position to take because you'll never be wrong for advocating doing nothing except what the front office actually does. Don't be so smug. If people want to react, let them react without feeling like that makes them lemmings.

Yeah that was really a blistering call out he put forth, just look at this chaos, this thread may hit 9 pages!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's not wrong though. You talk like a politician on here. Leaving yourself just enough wiggle room to say you never fully counted Bryce out if you need to....But we can all see it. Just say you think he is a bust outright and you will have to type a lot less. Obfuscating your opinion behind QB3 competitions etc....
    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
×
×
  • Create New...