Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Updated Roster Projection


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Kind of agree to an extent, I think we aren't looking at FA's on the offensive line.  I think we're looking at FA's at TE and DE's, especially.  Because there hasn't been anything we've seen from our backups at both positions that we should be excited about.  Especially with Panther scouts at the Jaguars game this past Saturday.  Jags have a plethora or TE's and DE's.  Just FYI.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

 


Nope, contrary to the rumblings.

Sent from my SM-G935P using CarolinaHuddle mobile app
 

 

Interesting.

Follow up question:

Based on how Hawkins has performed thus far, his young age/upside, and his familiarity with the playbook already, would a vet FA pickup be that much of an upgrade over him on the active roster? By all accounts he has outplayed Focoult and He was on the roster the past two years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Cracka McNasty said:

Interesting.

Follow up question:

Based on how Hawkins has performed thus far, his young age/upside, and his familiarity with the playbook already, would a vet FA pickup be that much of an upgrade over him on the active roster? By all accounts he has outplayed Focoult and He was on the roster the past two years. 

No, Hawkins has at least some sort of potential at this point.  And DG and Rivera love potential (they've kept Foucault on the roster for 2 1/2 years based on potential).  I think they keep him over signing some other random person.  Unless that random Tackle is a diamond in the rough in DG's eyes.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Cracka McNasty said:

Interesting.

Follow up question:

Based on how Hawkins has performed thus far, his young age/upside, and his familiarity with the playbook already, would a vet FA pickup be that much of an upgrade over him on the active roster? By all accounts he has outplayed Focoult and He was on the roster the past two years. 

Here's a nice look at Hawkins, from a contributor at BBR.  

http://blackandbluereview.com/preseason-week-2-good-average-bad/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...