Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kruger visiting Saints


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'll be shocked if Kruger is on our radar. How many times has Gettleman said leading up to the draft that players who aren't a scheme fit aren't on our draft board? Pretty sure all of Kruger's NFL experience is at 3-4 OLB. 

Yeah that's a very good point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'll be shocked if Kruger is on our radar. How many times has Gettleman said leading up to the draft that players who aren't a scheme fit aren't on our draft board? Pretty sure all of Kruger's NFL experience is at 3-4 OLB. 

He's a pass rushing specialist in the 3-4. I feel like the Panthers could have found a way to use him. But the same goes, he's not a 4-3 end like the Panthers scheme is. Another vet pass rusher will probably be available and I'd be shocked if we didn't add one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, AppHeel said:

Saints have like $2.65 (two dollars and 65 cents) of cap space available. How the hell are they bringing in anyone of consequence

the saints don't give anything resembling a poo because they're going to be doing what the browns are right now when brees retires.  dumping salaries and trading away dudes left and right.

they'll just convert somebody's salary to a signing bonus and open up a few million to make room

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, AppHeel said:

Saints have like $2.65 (two dollars and 65 cents) of cap space available. How the hell are they bringing in anyone of consequence

By cutting Keenan Lewis. That gave them $2.7 million of breathing space. Some of it already got used, tho, when they traded for Dolphins DE Chris McCain and signed former Raider OT Khalif Barnes

But that's what bad teams do at this time of year. Sign multiple leftover scraps and trade for career back-ups that have 2 sacks in 18 games while pinching their pennies

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, O-Ther said:

By cutting Keenan Lewis. That gave them $2.7 million of breathing space. Some of it already got used, tho, when they traded for Dolphins DE Chris McCain and signed former Raider OT Khalif Barnes

But that's what bad teams do at this time of year. Sign multiple leftover scraps and trade for career back-ups that have 2 sacks in 18 games while pinching their pennies

Barnes is depth. McCain was traded for a conditional 7th. I would assume that conditional is that if he makes the final 53, they'll get the pick. There will be multiple moves made all teams, not just bad ones. 

Didn't the Panthers just sign Major Wright and trade for a punter? Or is that different?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, saints4lifeagain said:

Barnes is depth. McCain was traded for a conditional 7th. I would assume that conditional is that if he makes the final 53, they'll get the pick. There will be multiple moves made all teams, not just bad ones. 

Didn't the Panthers just sign Major Wright and trade for a punter? Or is that different?

Yes, it is different, because we are much better in all facets of the game/organization as a whole than the Saints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, saints4lifeagain said:

Barnes is depth. McCain was traded for a conditional 7th. I would assume that conditional is that if he makes the final 53, they'll get the pick. There will be multiple moves made all teams, not just bad ones. 

Didn't the Panthers just sign Major Wright and trade for a punter? Or is that different?

The Panthers ha e won the division for three straight years. That's the difference. Two franchises headed in the opposite direction. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The Panthers ha e won the division for three straight years. That's the difference. Two franchises headed in the opposite direction. 

Which I'm aware of. I have no problem admitting the Panthers have been better. Just his particular example was irrelevant. Every team in football is making moves this time of year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, saints4lifeagain said:

Barnes is depth. McCain was traded for a conditional 7th. I would assume that conditional is that if he makes the final 53, they'll get the pick. There will be multiple moves made all teams, not just bad ones. 

Didn't the Panthers just sign Major Wright and trade for a punter? Or is that different?

You can claim Barnes is depth, but I'm not buying it. With Peat getting shuffled around your O-line like a deck of cards in Vegas, I'm thinking he's there to compete with Peat for a Guard spot, whichever one isn't occupied by Lelito or Kelemete

As for the trade, ours brought in a proven field changer to fill one of the very few spots we had open. Yours brought in a career back-up, which smells of desperation to find someone, anyone, who can pressure the pocket. Kikaha and Rankins are both hurt, and the Pelicans GM did a great not great job of bringing in depth behind those 2 in March and April

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, O-Ther said:

You can claim Barnes is depth, but I'm not buying it. With Peat getting shuffled around your O-line like a deck of cards in Vegas, I'm thinking he's there to compete with Peat for a Guard spot, whichever one isn't occupied by Lelito or Kelemete

As for the trade, ours brought in a proven field changer to fill one of the very few spots we had open. Yours brought in a career back-up, which smells of desperation to find someone, anyone, who can pressure the pocket. Kikaha and Rankins are both hurt, and the Pelicans GM did a great not great job of bringing in depth behind those 2 in March and April

That explains just how much you know. No one is there to compete with Peat for guard. I'm more than certain they'll be keeping an eye on cuts for a potential player at the other guard spot, but Peat has one locked down.

You traded a 4th round pick for a punter...

You seem to be putting a lot of stock into a trade for a conditional 7th round pick. This is basically a try out, as he was more than likely to be cut, this just kept the Saints from having to play the waiver game. Dan Campbell knows him well. 

I'm failing to see how the Saints didn't address the depth, unless they're suppose to have pro bowl players sitting on the bench. But the Saints brought in Fairley, Onyematta, and Rankins during the offseason for rotation in the interior. Kikaha was part of a rotation on the outside, one that the Saints aren't happy with the production out of. The Saints made major changes on defense this offseason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's say we have a LT for 2026, because we do.  After that, let's say we Ickey could be back and we would have the option of extending Walker.   Don't get me wrong--I LOVE drafting OL.  Teams obviously get desperate for OTs and if they enter the draft without 2 solid tackles, they are almost obligated to reach for a first round OT.  This year, I see 1 OT who is probably worth first-round consideration, and I am not putting him in the top 10 players in the draft.  Lomu, Freeling, Miller, and Proctor, for example, probably and arguably have second-round value.  So why would you reach for an OT in round 1 when you already have starters at both T positions but you have other needs? We do need depth, however, and I think there is decent OT depth that needs development on day 3. They are no slouches, by the way.   Drew Shelton (could drop to round 4): Surrendered 1 sack as Penn State's LT in 2025. 33 3/8" arms.  Pass pro improved every year (4 years--experienced).  "For a team running a zone-heavy scheme that values lateral movement and reach-blocking ability over phone-booth mauling, Shelton has real appeal. He is not a plug-and-play starter, but the athletic tools and the clear year-over-year improvement suggest a player who can develop into a capable starter if a coaching staff invests in his strength base and cleans up his technique. The ceiling depends entirely on how much stronger he can get and whether his feet can stay alive after initial contact."   Austin Barber  (could drop to round 4): I see him as a RT at best and a probable kick inside to Guard where his strengths would switch from secondary to primary tools.  Considering Lewis and Hunt may be gone in a year or two, this would give the Panthers a chance to work him at RT and then move him inside if he is not effective, and there is confidence that G may be his best position. Jude Bowery (4th round projection) was LT on a Boston College OL that was effective in the run game.  Bowery is one of the most athletic OTs in the draft.  His arms are not ideal but not too short (33.75") to play LT.  He surrendered 2 sacks. He is raw, and needs some technical refinement with his hands.  I think he has the best upside and value for this offense.   Dametrious Crownover  TexAM (5th round projection; 35 3/8" arms) is one of the more fascinating developmental tackles in this class because the physical tools are legitimately rare. A strong run blocker who should be better in pass protection with his tools.  "You do not find many 6-7, 336-pound men with that foot speed and who have the athletic background of a converted tight end. When everything clicks, he looks like a starting right tackle in a gap-heavy run scheme, smothering defenders at the point of attack and using his length to erase speed off the edge. The 2024 tape, when he anchored one of the best rushing attacks in the SEC, is the version of Crownover that gets offensive line coaches excited."  THIS is the kind of player our coaches could develop until Moton is done. What made World intriguing coming out of Eugene was the untapped ceiling, a fifth-year transfer who arrived as the top-ranked offensive tackle in the portal and looked the part for stretches. The improvement he showed against Big Ten competition in his one Oregon season was real, and the physical foundation, length, athleticism, and improving technique in pass protection, is still there. The ACL tear suffered in the College Football Playoff semifinal against Indiana doesn't erase that, but it changes the conversation significantly. The injury clouds the immediate projection. Most ACL recoveries for offensive linemen run nine to twelve months, which means World is likely unavailable for meaningful action well into his rookie season at the earliest. The combine absence removes his chance to reset the narrative physically, and teams will be making decisions almost entirely off pre-injury film and medical evaluations. The contrast between his polished pass sets and his inconsistent run blocking was already a developmental concern, and now those technique issues get deferred further while he rehabs. Isaiah World  (Oregon, injured ACL in playoffs, 5th round projection--could slide to 6th).  World will not play much if at all in 2026, which is why he might fall.  For the Panthers' purposes, however, this would give the OL coaches time to work with him. "What made World intriguing coming out of Eugene was the untapped ceiling, a fifth-year transfer who arrived as the top-ranked offensive tackle in the portal and looked the part for stretches. The improvement he showed against Big Ten competition in his one Oregon season was real, and the physical foundation, length, athleticism, and improving technique in pass protection, is still there. The ACL tear suffered in the College Football Playoff semifinal against Indiana doesn't erase that, but it changes the conversation significantly." "That said, the investment argument isn't crazy for the right organization. This is still a tackle with first-round portal grades and the kind of athletic profile that doesn't just disappear. A team with patience and a strong offensive line room can afford to stash World on the roster, let him develop his lower-body power and pad-level consistency during the recovery process, and potentially unlock a starting-caliber right tackle somewhere in his second or third season. The path is longer now, but the destination hasn't changed for a scout willing to bet on the physical tools." You get the idea. If we do not need the OT immediately, draft one later and develop him as depth and for next season.  Most college players drafted in round 1 were not first rounders if they had entered the draft the year before,  so why not grab a player with upside?      
    • Its never the QBs fault, so if we get a new WR and he looks bad he must be a bust
    • Based on what? Its certainly not his in game coaching prowess. 
×
×
  • Create New...