Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL execs compare Colin Kaepernick to Rae Carruth


Cookie Lyon

Recommended Posts

This is truly insane to compare Kaepernick to a guy that paid a hitman to murder his pregnant girlfriend. 

They called him a traitor and another executive also vowed to resign if the owner of the team asked him to sign Kaepernick. What a sick world we live in.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2651681-mike-freemans-10-point-stance-kaepernick-anger-intense-in-nfl-front-offices

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now the media is doing there thing....where they paint a world we don't actually live in.  I hate the we polled 20 people and let's listen to the one crazy guy to set the tone despite the other 19 being normal humans current media. 

But as an employer getting ready for a season and looking in that vacuum it is understandable why a team wouldn't want him.  They want to play a football season not deal with a Tebowesqe circus of it came to that.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Completely fabricated by BR. 

I'm not a big BR fan, but to be fair the article doesn't actually say what the thread title says it does.

Here's the Rae Carruth reference in full:

All seven estimated 90 to 95 percent of NFL front offices felt the same way they did. One executive said he hasn't seen this much collective dislike among front office members regarding a player since Rae Carruth. Remember Rae Carruth? He's still in prison for the plot to murderhis pregnant girlfriend.

So what the executive actually said was that he hasn't seen someone this universally disliked since Rae Carruth.

That's not the same as saying Colin Kaepernick is just as bad as Rae Carruth.

People are still free to criticize the executives stance on Kaepernick, of course, but it makes more sense to criticize then for something they actually said.

The thread title here isn't truly accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm not a big BR fan, but to be fair the article doesn't actually say what the thread title says it does.

Here's the Rae Carruth reference in full:

 

 

So what the executive actually said was that he hasn't seen someone this universally disliked since Rae Carruth.

That's not the same as saying Colin Kaepernick is just as bad as Rae Carruth.

People are still free to criticize the executives stance on Kaepernick, of course, but it makes more sense to criticize then for something they actually said.

The thread title here isn't truly accurate.

Its a Bullshit artical regardless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you think the NFL or NBA are worried about lawsuits or something like officiating scandals bringing down their empires, I think you're giving them way too much credit.  Go watch the documentary on Tim Donaghy in the NBA and who was involved and what he did.  One of the guys he worked with is still one of the league's top trusted officials, especially for playoff games.  IIRC, they have records showing he was the person Donaghy exchanged phone calls with the most during his time fixing games.  And his reputation is beyond horrible...  but he's untouchable.  I also encourage you to go watch DeMaurice Smith's Breakfast Club interview.  He laid out how for fans, we just know these organizations as a singular, public entity - like THE Carolina Panthers, or THE Dallas Cowboys- but, in actuality, he said that is the public-facing identity of an umbrella company comprised of countless smaller businesses and LLCs.  He is tasked with trying to audit their books, and he said these organizations are structured in such a way that even HE can't ever know what they truly make in a year.  It's impossible.  And now, this is just me speculating on top of that, but you think the league's themselves are structured similarly?  They are untouchable.  IIRC, they are recognized legally as "entertainment" organizations, thus protecting themselves in cases where integrity would come into question.  They are protected, layer, behind layer, behind layer.  Betting works because there is some degree of control that ensures the house wins more than it loses, by a lot.  The short of it is, "Give them bread and circuses" and all that jazz.  These leagues operate with total impunity.  Again, it's not just because I'm a Panthers fan, but even if I wasn't and I watched Superbowl 50 without a dog in the fight I would walk away feeling like that outcome was controlled and influenced HEAVILY to where the Panthers were not given a level playing field.  The same poo happens every Sunday to teams playing those blue blood franchises and ones with intriguing storylines. 
    • This Chuba isn't getting traded, but Rico very well could be in a few weeks if he keeps playing well in a tandem backfield with Chuba also playing well. I think we'd end up going with a two headed monster in that case, but with Rico being on a one year deal, it does open up the possibility of a contending team offering up a decent pick for him.  Depending on the recovery of Hampton, I could see someone like the Chargers giving us a 4th for him if they think he could put them over the top, he would fit nicely in a Harbaugh system I think. If it comes to that, we need to make that trade, as I can't see any way we re-sign Rico with all our other needs and getting Brooks back too.  And he's not going to get a contract big enough to get us any comp picks in return, especially if/when we sign a FA or two ourselves.  So if we're not going to bring him back, the prudent decision would really be to get a draft pick for him at the deadline.
    • It's all about what they do at QB. It's clear the rest of the roster is improving. If they commit long term to Young because he's being carried to wins then we're fuged. I think that's a separate issue to finally being competitive again.  There's no QB in this Draft that's going to ride in on his white horse on day one and save us, so we absolutely shouldn't be playing for Draft position. 
×
×
  • Create New...