Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

When are you all going to stop blaming the effing coaches???


CAPantherFan

Recommended Posts

Coaches = Captain of the ship, so while it may not be their fault they are responsible for this 0-2 start.

My two biggest criticisms are that this coaching staff is too slow to adjust and too set in their ways. I understand the Fox/Meeks cover 2 philosophy BUT IT'S NOT WORKING. When you've reached halftime and you're getting no pressure on a QB who is carving you up, it's time to call some blitzes. The irony is that defensive coordinators are often selected to be HC's because of their ability to adjust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Won't matter if Jerry Richardson does.

If he doesn't, let's be honest. Fox won't be out of a job long.

i used to feel that way but recent coach hiring trends aren't exactly working in his favor.

teams are avoiding older coaches, especially when they don't exactly have a reputation of winning much or able to win the big one. if he hits the market it is most likely going to be that holmgren and cowher are going to be in much higher demand. i would even say billings would be a better hire. schotty and shanny have given more reason to be hired than fox as well. the bulk of the hirings, though, are going to be just like most other teams have done lately.... going young and/or new. teams don't want HCs that are "damaged" goods.

fox will have a job but the best he can realistically hope for, imo, is a DC position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i used to feel that way but recent coach hiring trends aren't exactly working in his favor.

teams are avoiding older coaches, especially when they don't exactly have a reputation of winning much or able to win the big one. if he hits the market it is most likely going to be that holmgren and cowher are going to be in much higher demand. i would even say billings would be a better hire. schotty and shanny have given more reason to be hired than fox as well. the bulk of the hirings, though, are going to be just like most other teams have done lately.... going young and/or new. teams don't want HCs that are "damaged" goods.

fox will have a job but the best he can realistically hope for, imo, is a DC position.

Fox seems like a guy who can keep his team in the middle of the pack.. I'm expecting a horrible team would pick him up, but do not expect them to be an elite team after he raises them up...

With that said, I'm not too worried to see him picked up right away for fear of us losing something valuable.. Seems human nature to feel this way, considering we always expect a player to break out once we let him go.. (*ahem* Colbert/Carter)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Won't matter if Jerry Richardson does.

If he doesn't, let's be honest. Fox won't be out of a job long.

This will be the last year that John Fox is a head coach in this league. He'll find a spot as someone's defensive coordinator, but no team is going to want to start over with a 55-year-old coach that's known best for his mediocrity. Besides, the only other team with a coach on the hot seat right now is Jacksonville. I don't see Weaver replacing Del Rio with John Fox, although the humor value in seeing Del Rio screwed over like that would be hilarious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When your best defensive player we have ever had refuses to sign a contract that will make him one the highest (if not the highest) paid players in the league because the Fox scheme will not let him live up to his full potential. At some point, you gotta start scratching your head and say WTF is going on?

The bottom line is JP turned down a gazillion dollars so he would not have to play under Fox anymore. Of course we franchised his ass and he had no choice this season. I have never heard of a player doing that before. Remember this is coming from one of the most quiet and reserved/private players in the NFL so you have to be REALLY unhappy to turn down that kind of long term security.

Kris Jenkins also said he had enough of Fox and the team had no heart. Now he is gone and looking pretty good in NY.

Who is responsible for this? When the team looks lost and plays flat - who should be responsible? The players or the people that brought the players here? The people that develop the scheme? Remember we offered Turgo the opportunity to come back as DC but he chose to take a demotion instead of coming back. Can somebody explain how that is a good career move? Face it - he wanted out.

This staff is dysfunctional starting with Fox. Don't even get me started talking about the creative OC name Dan Henning now in Miami. He was a sleestack when he was with us. He leaves Fox and becomes a cutting edge innovator that the entire league is copying now. When I see Brown and Williams running the Wildcat in Miami, I can't help but think how Williams and Stewart would do in that type of role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Won't matter if Jerry Richardson does.

If he doesn't, let's be honest. Fox won't be out of a job long.

i honestly hope he does find a head coaching job on another team.

that way if they are minus a QB on his new team he will almost certainly offer up a draft pick for Delhomme. Might be a good one too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John Fox is a good coach, I really like what he does as a coach. So far, meeks defense looks weak, hopefully foxy will step up and take over. Davidson's offense looks good, Jake rebounded and will continue to make plays. If i blame anyone, its the big man upstairs lol.

We have been running John Fox's defense since the bye week last year, when he decided to take control from Trgo. The exact time the defense fell to a shat box.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...