Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL is a joke


R0CKnR0LLA

Recommended Posts

Let's just name it the WWE already.

NFL is so OBVIOUSLY rigged it's not even funny. If you haven't figured that out by now then honestly you are a fugging retard. I don't know what else to tell you, if you haven't figured it out with the mountain of evidence continuing to compile then you never will.

If you mouth breathing retards are still like "but uhhh why would they risk going to prison just to fix games" the US court system has already ruled that the NFL can legally fix games, all they are legally obligated to do is provide entertainment. They do whatever they want to ensure that they make the most $$$$$$, integrity be damned.

And for the record, I would be saying the same thing even if we hit the FG and won the game. poo is ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the NFL is the greatest business in the world.  They can freely manipulate anything, legally, and their fanbase will continously deny anything is happening.  The NFL is like life to people, and I enjoy it as well, but it's almost sad how much stock we put in other grown men playing a sport for our enjoyment.   It's basically the 401 Nigerian Prince scam level of evidence but we fall for it, every year.  Minus death it's basically a gladiator sport that so many of us cannot just let go, even though we know it's not completely fair out there.   They continously muddle the rules to where they can do whatever in the games, and they keep missing calls, yet they keep their jobs, and the fans think that's just normal and OK.   People will just ignore the fact that like 85% of all money is profit shared anyway so no one really loses that owns these teams (as to why thy don't fight the system).   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DFive said:

Look no further than Vegas odds. Thanks to the very close game, Vegas won. If the Panthers would've won, Vegas would've bust, and we can't have that. 

I live in Vegas, funny thing is last Super Bowl, about 6 hours before the game I got a text from some random number I've NEVER got a text from before (or since) pointing out that 85% of money was betting on the Panthers, and that I should get in on it too.

Why would some random number/company be trying to get me to bet on the Panthers? Usually Vegas wants equal bets on both side so that they win on the vig no matter who wins, but even with 85% bets on one side somebody was trying to get me to bet that same way. And then what proceeded was the most obvious biased bunch of refereeing I can remember. Vegas sure won a fug ton that's for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You may as well stop watching sports, Rock. Take off your tin foil hat and enjoy life maybe? It's just a game.

Vegas is the the only smaller-than-an-atom thread of logic you may have about any rigging. But that was the next poster who brought that up, not you. Entertainment value? Uh ... huh? Ok, provide us with all the calls they made against Denver to keep the game close. No? They just picked on us to make it close?

In no other world would it make sense for the NFL to want a Manningless Colorado team to win this one either. There's no point in it.

But every game to come, you knuckleheads will whine that the refs are purposely throwing flags against us because we're "us". Grow a set, stop it with the Carolina Inferiority Complex, and realize that while the refs did indeed miss calls tonight, it was not on purpose. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Zaximus said:

They can freely manipulate anything, legally, and their fanbase will continously deny anything is happening.

I think this is the biggest problem. Anytime a team gets screwed over there's 1/32 of the fanbase that's pissed and 31/32 of the fanbase that's either happy or doesn't care. When a team complains about a fix they get brushed off as a bunch of whiners that are just mad because they lost, any evidence is laughed off and ignored.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Still Brooklyn said:

You may as well stop watching sports, Rock. Take off your tin foil hat and enjoy life maybe? It's just a game.

Vegas is the the only smaller-than-an-atom thread of logic you may have about any rigging. But that was the next poster who brought that up, not you. Entertainment value? Uh ... huh? Ok, provide us with all the calls they made against Denver to keep the game close. No? They just picked on us to make it close?

In no other world would it make sense for the NFL to want a Manningless Colorado team to win this one either. There's no point in it.

But every game to come, you knuckleheads will whine that the refs are purposely throwing flags against us because we're "us". Grow a set, stop it with the Carolina Inferiority Complex, and realize that while the refs did indeed miss calls tonight, it was not on purpose. 

Keeping the first game of the season, the superbowl rematch, on prime time, close, definitely matters to the advertisers who get money back if the game loses viewers.  You know, advertising, the biggest revenue for the NFL (and shared amongst them).   The NFL also just really doesn't want Cam to be the face of their league.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, R0CKnR0LLA said:

I think this is the biggest problem. Anytime a team gets screwed over there's 1/32 of the fanbase that's pissed and 31/32 of the fanbase that's either happy or doesn't care. When a team complains about a fix they get brushed off as a bunch of whiners that are just mad because they lost, any evidence is laughed off and ignored.

Greatest business ever, basically.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...