Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who to pull for: week two edition


bigdog10

Recommended Posts

Here's to the panthers opening up a can on San Francisco and getting in the win column. 

Divisional relevance:

Pull for Arizona over Tampa, Oakland over Atlanta, and New York over New Orleans.  Our entire division is on the road in games that they are significant underdogs (New Orleans is the smallest dog at +4.5). Hopefully all three take one on the chin. 

Out of Conference relevance:

AFC over NFC:. Pull for the Titans over the Lions, 

Conference games:

pull for Washington over Dallas.  We will have a chance to get a head to head win against Washington later in the year and it's also always fun watching the boys lose

 Pull for the Vikings over the Packers.  Same reason as Washington.  We host Minnesota next week and could potentially use a Green Bay loss down the line with a conf record tie breaker.

Pull for the Bears over the Eagles.  Bears are 0-1, eagles are 1-0.....pretty easy one to figure here  

Pull for the Rams over Seahawks.  Call me crazy but I actually think the Rams win this one  

if all goes according to plan, here is how the NFC would shape up after week two  

2-0 teams:  Giants, Vikings

1-1 teams:  Panthers, Bucs, Lions, Bears, Packers, Seahawks, Cardinals, Rams, Niners, Redskins, Eagles

0-2 teams:  Cowboys, Falcons, Saints

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's against the rules in my house to ever pull for Washington and Pittsburgh.  I also think a Tampa win over Arizona would be more helpful, just because we're more likely to compete with AZ for seeding.  I'm fairly confident we'll have a better record than Tampa, and we'll take care of business against them, but I got to say their offense looked legit against ATL.  It was the Falcons, but still...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KillaCamNewton said:

disagree with AZ over Tampa. Tampa is not beating us for the division, Im more concerned with competing with AZ for seeding. Gonna be tough for them to not win the West if RW ankle is banged up

Do you really want a division rival getting two road wins to start a season?

worry about seeding later, worry about the division first. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, bigdog10 said:

Do you really want a division rival getting two road wins to start a season?

worry about seeding later, worry about the division first. 

 

ehhh, the Falcons started 5-0 last year. Our divisional rivals usually get in their own way without us needing to. I'm much more worried about playing a playoff game in Arizona, theyve never lost a playoff game in that stadium

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cheering for the bucs over the cardinals. This game is massive for both teams because I think seattle and carolina are going to win the south and west. That leaves two WC spots, one of which Im thinking will be the packers/vikings, the other will be tampa/arizona. Idk I just wouldnt feel good playing the cardinals at home or away. beating the same team in the playoffs 3 years in a row is quite the task. would rather face an inexperienced yet talent bucs squad who would just be happy to be in the playoffs at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really want to pull for the Cardinals over Tampa, but it might work out better the other way around. Another loss just might push ole Arians farther over the edge towards losing his locker room.  Personally for me that would be fun to watch. What an arrogant POS.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...