Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Patriots exploiting new kickoff rule to their benefit


Growl

Recommended Posts

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2016/09/23/through-three-games-patriots-have-played-kickoff-rule-perfectly/

 

Quote

 

 The Patriots have played three games and kicked off 18 times this season,

and they’ve still yet to allow an opposing team to take the ball out past the 25 yard line. 

 

It was kind of expected this offseason that the Panthers would be slow to adapt to the new rule. They've never been quick to capitalize on changes like this and it can be difficult to admit that something that was once a strength is now pretty much moot (Graham's ability to kick Touchbacks)

 

Most worrisome however, was their apparent refusal to adapt on KR. SF really kicked our butt on ST Sunday, exploiting the rule change over and over and pinning us inside the 20. Most notably, obviously was the free 7 points they picked up that risked changing the game when Ginn had to come from the goalpost over to the left side of the field and about ten yards up from where he was, interrupting his routine and by his own admission leading to the bobble.

 

Quote

 

 “With the scheme we had and the mortar kicks, it was kind of a hard deal for us,”

 

This could've been a massive deal against a better team, and perhaps fortuitously, swallowing our medicine against the Whiners may have been to our benefit, as the team admitted they had to adjust after that.

 

However, we've seen in the past the team admit they made a mistake only to trot out the same schematical philosophy the week after, and id like to hope the team has spent the week altering both phases of kickoff to exploit the new rule. 

 

They'll have to at some point-willingly giving teams an extra 5 yards is notable. Consider the affect this has on the defense in comparison to last year, and then look a domino further and look at how many points the offense scored off of defensive turnovers.

 

Refusing to adjust could lead to a domino effect that hurts the team in the long run. It can be difficult to swallow that the game may have passed you by, but the Panthers need to put aside their feelings quick or risk ending up looking like Tampa from a few years back-desperately trying to make a Kiffin Cover 2 work in a league that had long since left it behind.

 

Quote

 

 Our kickoff guys are doing a great job. It would be dumb just to kick it out of the end zone every time right now,” Gostkowski told USA Today.

 

Indeed it would.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This whole thing to me just shows the utter stupidity of the NFL.  First, they make a rule moving the kickoff up 5 yards to get more touchbacks so as to reduce injuries on returns.  Then they turn around a couple of years later and move the starting point from touchbacks out 5 yards which encourages the kicking team to kick short in order to force a return in order to pin the receiving team behind the 25. 

I can't really blame teams for taking advantage of the rules.  And I think this past past weeks game with the 9ers showed why it's still not a bad idea to kick the ball deep in order to force touchbacks.  On one Carolina kick-off that did go short, SF ran the ball out to around the 35.  Then on the SF kick-off following Ginn's mishandling of the ball which gave them the ball on the 1, Ginn returned the ball into 49er territory, almost breaking it for a TD.  So, do you kick-off knowing you're giving the opponent an extra 5 yards, or take a chance on trying to pin them deeper and them getting a good return?

As thefuzz says, our special teams has been a weakness, so I'm not upset about them not trying to take advantage of the rule. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ShutDwn said:

If not for the fumbles we're talking about an average of a few yards difference between returns and touchbacks.

 

One return TD and the cost benefit is back to zero.

Exactly. It's a strategy. Just like any strategy it has the potential to blow up in your face in a hurry if not executed properly. Such is the life of a coach. You're a genius when it works, you're an idiot when it doesn't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Not sure how they're "abusing" it. Fug the Pats, but all they're doing here is strategically taking advantage of a new, poorly thought out rule. Before the season even started, many were speculating that this is exactly what some if not most NFL teams would do. 

I don't know if you read the post but this thread isn't actually about the Patriots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how the Pats are handling this stupid rule. A nice F U to the rule and spinning it to their advantage. 

As to the dude who said "it's only 5 yards" I would love to see someone **cough** @KB_fan **cough** show some data on avg starting position and scoring % broken down further FG vs TD. 

I have a feeling that only a "few yards" can make a pretty big difference. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...