Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ron presser at 1:15 today


Captain Morgan

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, The Lobo said:

Wait, Sanchez on the outside? Wasn't he drafted to play nickel? Can't McClain play outside and Sanchez nickel?

I believe Sanchez played outside in college and had a lot of picks there. I think he was only in the nickel here because of his size and the outside is his more natural position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Growl said:

Ron has never been a young players' guy. Especially with the open admission that this about age rather than talent.

 

Now to be totally honest. Not a whole lot of coaches want to play the kids. Kids make mistakes. Mistakes can cost you games. Lose too many games, and you are no longer a coach.

 

Coaches tend to play players they can trust. Young guys have to earn that trust. Fans can sometimes lose sight of that fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Kevin Greene said:

Dissension in the DB corp coming to a head over Norman. 

Just got cut out.

The dissension is only getting started.

Bene is not the only one that was pissed over the Norman debacle. They trusted the coaches and the front office with their angle on the rookies. Now, with all the mistakes the rookies are making and costing the Panthers defense (especially late in games) the dissension is gaining momentum.

The rooks cost the Panthers late against the Broncos and Vikings. They cost the Panthers at the very start of the Falcons game.

The vets are still taken back with the lack of execution by Boston and Ealy. They were fine with Bene in the slot (not trying to cover for struggling rookies at corner). Now they have to deal with the lack of urgency, lack of discipline, lack of execution, lack of physicality, lack of reaction, and lack of passion from Bradberry, Worley, Butler, and now Sanchez.

The rookies are being coddled and protected from the vet discipline that usually reigns down by the coaches and front office.

If you think Bene was pissed at being put out there to cover for a struggling Bradberry and Worley in the game, and then taking all the accountability while the rookies were coddled, then you have yet to see the dissension from other vets that were led to believe they were going into the 2016 season with the same core (if not better) team that went to the SB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CPantherKing said:

The dissension is only getting started.

Bene is not the only one that was pissed over the Norman debacle. They trusted the coaches and the front office with their angle on the rookies. Now, with all the mistakes the rookies are making and costing the Panthers defense (especially late in games) the dissension is gaining momentum.

The rooks cost the Panthers late against the Broncos and Vikings. They cost the Panthers at the very start of the Falcons game.

The vets are still taken back with the lack of execution by Boston and Ealy. They were fine with Bene in the slot (not trying to cover for struggling rookies at corner). Now they have to deal with the lack of urgency, lack of discipline, lack of execution, lack of physicality, lack of reaction, and lack of passion from Bradberry, Worley, Butler, and now Sanchez.

The rookies are being coddled and protected from the vet discipline that usually reigns down by the coaches and front office.

If you think Bene was pissed at being put out there to cover for a struggling Bradberry and Worley in the game, and then taking all the accountability while the rookies were coddled, then you have yet to see the dissension from other vets that were led to believe they were going into the 2016 season with the same core (if not better) team that went to the SB.

Whenever you post, a Falcons fan gets a new sound system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Growl said:

Look at all your poor feeble minds trying to apply logic to a place where none exists

you can't reason with the ideology of a man whose goal is to simply make a name for himself

Agreed.

 

 

 

 

Oh, sorry. I thought we were talking about you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CPantherKing said:

The dissension is only getting started.

Bene is not the only one that was pissed over the Norman debacle. They trusted the coaches and the front office with their angle on the rookies. Now, with all the mistakes the rookies are making and costing the Panthers defense (especially late in games) the dissension is gaining momentum.

The rooks cost the Panthers late against the Broncos and Vikings. They cost the Panthers at the very start of the Falcons game.

The vets are still taken back with the lack of execution by Boston and Ealy. They were fine with Bene in the slot (not trying to cover for struggling rookies at corner). Now they have to deal with the lack of urgency, lack of discipline, lack of execution, lack of physicality, lack of reaction, and lack of passion from Bradberry, Worley, Butler, and now Sanchez.

The rookies are being coddled and protected from the vet discipline that usually reigns down by the coaches and front office.

If you think Bene was pissed at being put out there to cover for a struggling Bradberry and Worley in the game, and then taking all the accountability while the rookies were coddled, then you have yet to see the dissension from other vets that were led to believe they were going into the 2016 season with the same core (if not better) team that went to the SB.

Reminder again, this fraud has no inside sources and is a complete phony who just makes stuff up.

He serves no purpose on this board other than to be someone to point and laugh at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CPantherKing said:

The dissension is only getting started.

Bene is not the only one that was pissed over the Norman debacle. They trusted the coaches and the front office with their angle on the rookies. Now, with all the mistakes the rookies are making and costing the Panthers defense (especially late in games) the dissension is gaining momentum.

The rooks cost the Panthers late against the Broncos and Vikings. They cost the Panthers at the very start of the Falcons game.

The vets are still taken back with the lack of execution by Boston and Ealy. They were fine with Bene in the slot (not trying to cover for struggling rookies at corner). Now they have to deal with the lack of urgency, lack of discipline, lack of execution, lack of physicality, lack of reaction, and lack of passion from Bradberry, Worley, Butler, and now Sanchez.

The rookies are being coddled and protected from the vet discipline that usually reigns down by the coaches and front office.

If you think Bene was pissed at being put out there to cover for a struggling Bradberry and Worley in the game, and then taking all the accountability while the rookies were coddled, then you have yet to see the dissension from other vets that were led to believe they were going into the 2016 season with the same core (if not better) team that went to the SB.

Wasn't Bradberry hurt early in the game and therefore didn't play much? Of all the rookies he's by far the best one and does well most of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, The Lobo said:

Wasn't Bradberry hurt early in the game and therefore didn't play much? Of all the rookies he's by far the best one and does well most of the time.

Bradberry's pride and psyche were hurt by Julio.

Bradberry got beat bad several times, was replaced by Worley, then Worley was beat bad, and then they replaced him with Bene. Bene was left on Julio for a majority of the game. When Bene got beat bad late in the game Bradberry came back in to play.

If Bradberry were injured bad enough to keep him out of most of the game, then why bring him back at the end of the game when it is basically over? Bradberry even said he could play. The coaches kept him out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, CPantherKing said:

Bradberry's pride and psyche were hurt by Julio.

Bradberry got beat bad several times, was replaced by Worley, then Worley was beat bad, and then they replaced him with Bene. Bene was left on Julio for a majority of the game. When Bene got beat bad late in the game Bradberry came back in to play.

If Bradberry were injured bad enough to keep him out of most of the game, then why bring him back at the end of the game when it is basically over? Bradberry even said he could play. The coaches kept him out.

Please stop posting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Kevin Greene said:

Dissension in the DB corp coming to a head over Norman. 

Just got cut out.

 

6 hours ago, CPantherKing said:

The dissension is only getting started.

Bene is not the only one that was pissed over the Norman debacle. They trusted the coaches and the front office with their angle on the rookies. Now, with all the mistakes the rookies are making and costing the Panthers defense (especially late in games) the dissension is gaining momentum.

The rooks cost the Panthers late against the Broncos and Vikings. They cost the Panthers at the very start of the Falcons game.

The vets are still taken back with the lack of execution by Boston and Ealy. They were fine with Bene in the slot (not trying to cover for struggling rookies at corner). Now they have to deal with the lack of urgency, lack of discipline, lack of execution, lack of physicality, lack of reaction, and lack of passion from Bradberry, Worley, Butler, and now Sanchez.

The rookies are being coddled and protected from the vet discipline that usually reigns down by the coaches and front office.

If you think Bene was pissed at being put out there to cover for a struggling Bradberry and Worley in the game, and then taking all the accountability while the rookies were coddled, then you have yet to see the dissension from other vets that were led to believe they were going into the 2016 season with the same core (if not better) team that went to the SB.

You know if you were a better troll you'd think this ish up yourself. 

But you're not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I said could, not would. I recognize he has potential based on past performance. Compared to what KP has done, Howell has more potential and the physical traits to make noise. KP has small hands and a weak arm. Not something you want in even your backup QB.  I've been hammering since last off-season before we re-signed Dalton, improve the room. Other than getting younger, I don't see how anyone can say we legitimately improved the room or even tried. We might as well have signed Josh Rosen.  Dalton is still on the roster for now. That's 3 QBs unless we trade or cut him. He's still Bryce's mentor after all. Do you believe we are going to draft someone with potential and give them a legitimate opportunity to develop from the practice squad? Are we going to carry 3 QBs on the active roster? 4 for a developmental rookie? Are we going to potentially cut KP if we draft a rookie and he's outperformed? Doubtful. Cutting Dalton(if we can't trade him) and KP would be 8m in wasted cap space.  I chose Howell as an example because he showed promise in his only full season as a starter. You could plug in another name with the physical traits and potential and what i said would still apply. KP showed almost nothing and was benched. I genuinely don't care if it’s rookie pick as long as there is the potential to develop into a future NFL QB.  As much as I can't stand him, Bellichek was always developing a number 2 QB even with the GOAT as his starter. The wisdom of that was evident when Cassell came in when Brady was hurt week 1 and went 11-5 and almost made the wildcard, which 11-5 gets you almost any other year. I give credit where it's due though. Cassel and Jimmy G both came into the league as developmental QBs, potential QB1s, and went on to have careers.  You never know if you never try. KP feels like a punt in addressing the most important position on the field. Bryce has never played 2 full games of franchise QB level football back to back.  If Bryce progresses, are you ready to offer a 280m 5 year extension based off a one hit wonder year? If Bryce regresses and we need a QB in 27, are we going to trade a fortune away again to trade up to 1 to get one? Are you ready to do the past 3 years all over again?  To me, it's not about Kenny Pickett. It's about the move itself. It was a feeble attempt to improve the QB room. We better hope Bryce succeeds, because if he doesn't, we literally have no backup plan right now.   
    • IOL that early isn’t good value at all. We have a LT who might not ever be good again and a RT that might retire soon. T seems deep early in this draft, so I’d go there in the 1st. 
    • Season tickets aren't affordable anymore definitely when they've been so bad for 8 years before last season. When I started going my seats were front row uppers for like 38 bucks. Those seats are 100 dollars now. Teams make their money from tv, if I was an owner my goal would be to break even on tickets and concessions. 
×
×
  • Create New...