Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tall cups of whisky neat and a yo ho ho

a_gumbel

By a_gumbel,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

a_gumbel Contributor

a_gumbel

Posted
Posted

If you were to fight a panther and a buccaneer in some sort of cage match my money is on the panther now the buccaneer got a sword and that's pretty bad ass but if you took that away you'd also have to take away the panthers claws to make it a fair fight, that being said, declawed panther still mauls unsworded buttaneer cause superior incisors and whatnot. So ipso facto I got a good feeling come Monday

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, rodeo said:

Buccaneers used guns more than swords. And you can't just decide to take away things from them, because these are defining characteristics. A buccaneer would beat a panther by shooting it. 

 

Oh but roedo, you could not be more wrong. Captain Jack Sparrow only had one bullet, but he crossed swords with lots of folks.

 

The defining characteristic of a Pirate, is his sword. Given that, I'll take the Panther. I don't know why you expect a fair fight from it. It will stalk your azz until it finds a weakness. Then....well, let's just say, I would not plan on a late dinner if I was the Pirate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
52 minutes ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

well we've done it. We've sunk to an all time low as a board. Thanks to all the dumbasses that make this place unbearable 95% of the time these days.

 

 

 

ps:  don't declaw your cats. If you plan to, please find your cat a better home instead. 

 

Dude. You truly are Mr. "GET OF MY LAWN"  aren't you? Have you ever checked how many threads you jump into to spout this spiel? At least you are consistent. I like consistency. Hey, so does Ron. Him and I are bros. Did you know that.

 

And yea. You don't deserve a pet if you cannot take care of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
motocross_cat Community Regular

motocross_cat

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

well we've done it. We've sunk to an all time low as a board. Thanks to all the dumbasses that make this place unbearable 95% of the time these days.

 

 

 

ps:  don't declaw your cats. If you plan to, please find your cat a better home instead. 

Shut the fug up.  Find another fourm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • frankw
      Panthers Preseason

      By frankw · Posted

      Ideally Bryce and the other starters should get at least a full quarter and an argument could be made for 2 full quarters given how they've played early in the season the last few years.
    • CRA
      Barnwell - Ranking WR, TE, RB Groups in NFL

      By CRA · Posted

      A rookie that has never played a snap and a proven 1000K NFL WR are not going to be viewed the same in these type rankings.  And calling draft picks, lotto picks, isn't some new quip I just invented.  take the big 3 Hubbard, AT, insert whatever 3rd Panther you want vs Kamara, Hill, Olave.  Most football folks outside of Carolina are picking the Saints there IMO.    
    • WUnderhill
      Barnwell - Ranking WR, TE, RB Groups in NFL

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      You didn’t really address the point, just like you ignored the point about the RBs initially, and saying “they are all lotto picks” is just a really silly reduction because you could say that about literally any player rookie or vet every snap, every game, every year. It is well known that different positions have different hit rates, and I would argue different types of prospects within position groups as well, and that hit rates change the further down in the draft you go. Everybody knows QB is different and that, for example, first round OL have a really high success rate. Using your lotto ticket analogy…again…you are saying a lotto ticket with a 1 in 100 chance of hitting is the exact same thing as a lotto ticket with a 1 in 2 chance of hitting (this is an example, don’t take these odds literally). The point was he is no more of a lotto ticket than the 31yr old receiver coming off a major knee injury, and in my opinion he is better odds with a higher potential “jackpot”. Saying one player is an “lotto ticket” while another isn’t is just not sound logic. You have no idea who will break out, regress, get injured, etc. There are safer bets than others, that’s all. I don’t think Diggs is a safe bet and even if he was, weighing him over all of the Panthers WRs plus 2 1k rushers is just dumb. You can disagree if you want. The list is stupid.
×
×
  • Create New...