Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Buddy Ryan method


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Back in the late 80s/early 90s when he was coaching the Philadelphia Eagles, the late Buddy Ryan summed up his philosophy of how to win games in pretty simple terms.

Ryan believed all that he needed was for dynamic quarterback Randall Cunningham to make one or two big plays a game and his dominating defense would take care of the rest.

Did it work?

Three of Ryan's five seasons coaching the Eagles finished with ten or more wins, but all three playoff appearances were one and done.

So...Sort of.

In spite of his overall successful record, after the third playoff loss the Eagles fired Ryan. He would later finish his football career coaching the Arizona Cardinals in 1995, a season that would include an embarrassing loss to the expansion Carolina Panthers.

Ron Rivera wouldn't join the Eagles staff till several years after Ryan's tenure, but Ryan was a coach and a mentor to Rivera during his time with the Bears.

Fast forward to today, and some folks see some similarities between Ryan's approach with Randall Cunningham and Rivera's method with Cam Newton.

So in light of that, two questions...

Do you believe Rivera is using the same philosophy that Ryan did?

If so, is this genuinely a philosophy that can lead to sustained success?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Three of Ryan's five seasons coaching the Eagles finished with ten or more wins, but all three playoff appearances were one and done.

To be fair. They dealt with the death of Jerome Brown one season and played in a playoff game that shouldn't have been played (Fog Bowl).

16 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Do you believe Rivera is using the same philosophy that Ryan did?

No.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

I don't think that's what Rivera's doing at all Scot, I think you're completely off on this one.

Didn't say. I asked a question.

To amend the question though, even if you don't believe he's doing so consciously, is that what we've morphed into?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say that our offense is overly dependent on big plays to succeed. Biggest case in point: Ted Ginn. He had 10 TD's last season. Right now, zero. Defensively, hard to say they are dominating anyone. At the least, the game changing turnovers in our favor haven't been there for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, outlaw4 said:

I'd say that our offense is overly dependent on big plays to succeed. Biggest case in point: Ted Ginn. He had 10 TD's last season. Right now, zero. Defensively, hard to say they are dominating anyone. At the least, the game changing turnovers in our favor haven't been there for us.

Would you chalk that up to dependence on Cam or is that just the nature of the Coryell offense we run?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Would you chalk that up to dependence on Cam or is that just the nature of the Coryell offense we run?

When you have a huge man with a rocket arm that can also run, then you tend to dip into that well. Problem is that it only works if you give him the time. I said it in another thread but from a pass perspective, you have to see Cam as a Drew Bledsoe. Big pass plays have to come from the pocket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's a hard player to rank, cause he is a young NT. I do see his abilities to branch out among the DL. That's the only way for him to land in the 1st, some team has to believe he's got the stuff to play DE or T3.... I just don't see using 19 on him, I feel there should be around 7 players just ranked higher than him for the Panthers team.  ___________________________________________________________________   Now you are a roster nut like me. Im tossing this into fire, I think a good move is to trade UP, yes rare. Just the roster #s tell me 5 rookies and no more than 2 starters will make the team. I feel 5 is magic number.    QB- 2  BY, Pickett RB- 3   Chubba, Brooks(pls), etienne TE- 4   Sanders, Temble, Evans, Draft pick/major/franks/UDFA OL- 10   Walker, Lewis, Fortner, Hunt, Motown, Zavailla, Samac, Stone, Draft pick, Draft pick/Charles/carter WR-  6   Tmac, XL, Coker, Metch, Horn, Tremay   offense=  25 with 3 draft picks   DL-  6   Brown, Brown, Wharton, Ray, Cam, Hunter/draft pick Ed-   5  Phillips, Nic, Prince, Jones, ST/incoom/hampton ILB-   5  Lloyd, Wallace, Bam, Claud, draft pick CB-    5 Horn, Jackson, Thor, Evans, draft pick/CSN/UDFA SS-  4  Scott, More, Ramsom, Sim   Defense = 25 with 3 picks   ST = known 3+o+d = 53 roster   SO I see only room for 5-6 with factoring in UDFA pool. That tells me to trade up! Bonus the 1st+3rd gets in front of TB yucs. Then use one of the 5ths+2nd to draft another target. That's your two starters and use the 4th, 5th and 6th for the development OTs and what ever the best player are at the pick/DB. The last couple years they have added 2-3 UDFA each year, maybe the same this year too. Soooooooo Im normally 95% trade back, but above made me change my mind. I do not want to waive 5th rounder, I feel thats high with players on the bench.    ??      
    • Big game tonight. Please send the annoying ass bandwagon New York fans home sad
×
×
  • Create New...